EWTN News, the flagship media outlet of the conciliar sect’s “conservative” wing, reports that the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) will conduct “several meetings” with victims of clerical sexual abuse during his upcoming apostolic journey to Uruguay, Argentina, and Peru from November 6–17. The Holy See Press Office states these encounters “reflect the Pope’s desire to express his closeness to those who have suffered” and aim “to work with [abuse victims] in building paths of healing accessible to anyone in need, and to ensure that the Church is a safe and spiritually healthy place that lives and proclaims the Gospel.” The article notes similar staged meetings in Lourdes (France) and Madrid (Spain), framing them as a “custom” of the current claimant to the See of Peter. This orchestrated spectacle of therapeutic sentimentality exposes the complete substitution of the Church’s supernatural mission for a naturalistic public relations strategy designed to legitimize a counterfeit hierarchy.
The Usurper’s Itinerary: A Circus of Sentimentalism
The cited article functions as a press release for the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican. It announces the travel schedule of Robert Prevost — a man who, by his public adherence to the heresies of Vatican II, the Novus Ordo Missae, and the false ecumenism of the conciliar revolution — has ipso facto severed himself from the Catholic Church and cannot hold the papal office. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches, “a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church” (De Romano Pontifice). The “Defense of Sedevacantism” file confirms: “A Pope-manifest heretic loses his office automatically… by notorious and publicly manifested heresy, the Roman Pontiff… is deprived ipso facto of his personal jurisdiction even before any declaratory sentence by the Church.” Prevost’s “meetings” are thus the actions of a private individual usurping the Chair of Peter, not the pastoral acts of a true Vicar of Christ.
Linguistic Deconstruction: The Vocabulary of the Neo-Church
The rhetoric deployed by the Holy See Press Office — parroted uncritically by EWTN — reveals the animus of the conciliar sect. Terms like “closeness,” “healing,” “safe and spiritually healthy place,” and “paths of healing accessible to anyone in need” belong to the lexicon of secular psychotherapy and NGO humanitarianism, not Catholic theology. Nowhere does the statement mention sin, penance, reparation, the state of grace, the sacraments, divine justice, or the Final Judgment. The victim is not called to conversion or to unite suffering with the Crucified; the “Church” is not called to purge itself of the modernist clergy who caused the crisis; God is not invoked as the offended Majesty. This is pelagianism disguised as compassion: man “building paths” without grace, the institution making itself “safe” by bureaucratic protocol rather than holy.
Pius XI in Quas Primas condemns this exact inversion: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The conciliar sect’s “Church” derives its authority from media management and “safeguarding” policies, not from Christ the King. Its “Gospel” is reduced to a vague humanitarianism: “lives and proclaims the Gospel” becomes a slogan for social work, the kerygma emptied of the Cross.
Theological Bankruptcy: Therapeutic Humanism vs. The Kingship of Christ
The article’s framing — “express his closeness,” “building paths of healing” — epitomizes the hermeneutic of rupture inaugurated at Vatican II. The true Church, as Pius XI teaches, possesses a threefold authority: legislative, judicial, executive (Quas Primas). She binds consciences to divine law, judges doctrinal and moral deviations, and coerces the obstinate by canonical penalties. The conciliar sect replaces this with accompaniment and listening. The Syllabus of Errors (Pius IX) condemns the proposition: “The Church is not a true and perfect society, entirely free… but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church” (Error 19). Today, the neo-church submits to the civil power’s definition of “safeguarding,” adopting secular standards of “transparency” and “accountability” while abandoning the canonical penalties that once protected the faithful (e.g., Canon 2359 §2 of the 1917 Code: clerics guilty of solicitation in confession to be degraded).
The “meetings” are a liturgical act of the new religion: the antipope as high priest of the “cult of man” (condemned by Pius XI in Quas Primas as the fruit of laicism). The victims are not directed to the Confessional or the Most Holy Sacrifice; they are offered a photo-op with the usurper. This is idolatry — the creature (the “pope,” the “institution,” “healing”) worshipped in place of the Creator.
The Abuse Crisis: Fruit of the Conciliar Apostasy
The article treats the abuse crisis as a standalone scandal requiring “healing paths.” Integral Catholic faith sees it as the inevitable fruit of the Modernist revolution. St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (1907) condemned the Modernist proposition: “The Church is incapable of effectively defending evangelical ethics, because it steadfastly adheres to its views, which cannot be reconciled with modern progress” (Prop. 63). The conciliar sect, having abandoned evangelical ethics (chastity, obedience, the horror of sin), having replaced the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary with a Protestantized “table of assembly,” having ordained men formed in seminaries steeped in psychologism and homophile ideology — this sect now reaps the whirlwind.
The “Defense of Sedevacantism” file demonstrates that the post-1958 claimants to the papacy are manifest heretics who have ipso facto lost office. Cum ex Apostolatus Officio (Pope Paul IV) declares: “if at any time it shall appear that any… Roman Pontiff… has defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect.” The “clergy” of the neo-church — many invalidly ordained under the Paul VI rite (1968) — are not true priests. Their “abuse” is not merely criminal; it is sacrilege compounded by the nullity of their orders and mission. The conciliar hierarchy’s “meetings” with victims are a cover-up of the root cause: the loss of the Faith, the loss of the Priesthood, the loss of the Church.
Symptomatic Analysis: The PR Strategy of the Abomination of Desolation
The article notes the “custom” of such meetings: Lourdes (publicized), Madrid (private, then leaked). This reveals the calculated media management of the paramasonic structure. The “False Fatima Apparitions” file exposes the modus operandi of the enemies of the Church: “Stage 2 (1940-1958): Globalization of the cult and control of the narrative through Lucia’s isolation. Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” Today, Stage 4: management of the abuse crisis narrative to preserve the legitimacy of the usurpers. EWTN, as the “conservative” mouthpiece, plays its assigned role: normalizing the antipope, framing his gestures as “pastoral,” silencing the sedevacantist truth.
The mention of “Uruguay, Argentina, and Peru” is significant. These nations, once Catholic, have been ravaged by Liberation Theology (condemned by the CDF in 1984 and 1986 under the true Pope Gregory XVII? No — under the usurper John Paul II, but the condemnation was doctrinally sound though ignored). The antipope visits the ruins to bless the demolition. Pius XI warned: “The state must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders and Congregations… who are indeed the most valiant helpers of the Pastors of the Church and contribute most to the expansion and establishment of Christ’s Kingdom” (Quas Primas). The neo-church has destroyed religious orders, replacing them with NGOs. Its “apostolic journey” is a victory lap over the corpse of Christendom in Latin America.
The Silence That Condemns
What the article omits is the loudest accusation. No mention of:
- The Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (the Novus Ordo is a cena, not a sacrificium propitiatorium);
- The Sacrament of Penance as the ordinary means of grace for victims and perpetrators;
- The Canonical deposition of guilty clerics (impossible in a sect with no valid jurisdiction);
- The Social Kingship of Christ over civil laws that now protect abortion, “gay marriage,” and gender ideology in Argentina and Uruguay;
- The necessity of the Catholic Faith for salvation (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus);
- The reality of Hell for unrepentant abusers and their enablers.
This silence is apostasy in action. The conciliar sect proclaims a “Gospel” without the Cross, a “Church” without the Kingship of Christ, a “mercy” without justice. As Pius XI declared: “If rulers and legitimate superiors will have the conviction that they exercise authority not so much by their own right as by the command and in the place of the Divine King, everyone will notice how religiously and wisely they will use their authority.” The antipope exercises authority in the place of the Prince of this World, managing the decline of the institution he usurps.
Conclusion: Reject the Counterfeit; Return to the King
The EWTN article is not news; it is propaganda for the Antichurch. It invites the faithful to admire the “compassion” of a manifest heretic who has no jurisdiction, no mission, no sacraments. The “meetings” in Latin America are a theatrical distraction from the truth: the Chair of Peter is vacant; the true Church subsists in the remnant of bishops and priests who preserve the integral Faith, the Traditional Latin Mass, and the unbroken canonical tradition. Quas Primas commands: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ.” The antipope refuses it; EWTN ignores it; the victims are exploited by it. Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus imperat — not in the conciliar sect’s “safe spaces,” but in the Unbloody Sacrifice offered on altars where the true Faith remains.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV to meet with abuse victims during his trip to Latin America (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 27.10.2026