Vatican News, the official propaganda organ of the structures occupying the Vatican, reports that the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) has expressed “deep sorrow” at the death of Richard Daniel Alarcón Urrutia, the Novus Ordo “Archbishop” of Cusco, Peru, who died on October 30, 2026, at age 74. The antipope dispatched a message to the newly appointed “Coadjutor Archbishop” Lizardo Estrada Herrera, OSA, praising the deceased as a “selfless pastor,” entrusting his soul to “Our Lady of Bethlehem” (“Mamacha Belén”), and announcing his intention to visit Cusco on November 15 to “pray alongside the community.” The Peruvian “Bishops’ Conference” issued a concomitant statement, joining in prayer for the “dedicated servant of His Church.” This theatrical display of ecclesiastical bureaucracy and humanitarian sentimentality, utterly devoid of the supernatural language of the True Church, lays bare the complete substitution of the Kingdom of Christ for a purely naturalistic, paramasonic NGO.
The Usurpation of Peter’s See: A Manifest Heretic Cannot Be Pope
The very premise of the article—that Robert Prevost, styling himself “Leo XIV,” exercises any authority in the Catholic Church—is a doctrinal impossibility. As the Defense of Sedevacantism file demonstrates with irrefutable theological and canonical precision, a manifest heretic loses the papacy ipso facto, without need of any declaratory sentence. St. Robert Bellarmine teaches: “A Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” The line of claimants since John XXIII—including Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, and now Prevost—have all publicly professed the heresies of Modernism condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane exitu and Pascendi Dominici Gregis: the evolution of dogma, religious liberty, false ecumenism, and the collegiality that subverts the monarchical constitution of the Church. By Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Pope Paul IV decreed that if any Cardinal or Roman Pontiff “has defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy… his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect.” Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code confirms: “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration… if the cleric publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” The “election” of Prevost is therefore a canonical nullity; he is a private individual, a layman masquerading as the Vicar of Christ.
The Fiction of “Episcopal Ordination” in the Conciliar Sect
The article notes that Alarcón Urrutia “received episcopal ordination in 2001” and that Estrada Herrera was “appointed as Coadjutor Archbishop of Cusco on August 29” by the antipope. This highlights the sacramental catastrophe of the new rite of episcopal consecration promulgated by Paul VI in 1968, which altered the essential form and intention required for validity. As Archbishop Lefebvre himself recognized—though he inconsistently maintained communion with the usurpers—the new rite omits the explicit transmission of the sacerdotal priesthood and the power to govern, rendering it at best doubtful, at worst invalid. Furthermore, the “bishops” of the conciliar sect derive their “mission” from a false pope; ipso facto, they possess no jurisdiction in the True Church. Pope Pius XII taught in Mystici Corporis that jurisdiction comes from the Roman Pontiff; if the Pontiff is a usurper, the jurisdiction is non-existent. These men are not successors of the Apostles but functionaries of a counterfeit hierarchy.
Reduction of the Church’s Mission to Naturalistic Humanism
The linguistic level of the article is damning. The antipope calls Alarcón a “selfless pastor”—a purely sociological category. He entrusts the soul to “Our Lady of Bethlehem” (“Mamacha Belén”), a title redolent of the inculturated, Pachamama-syncretism that Francis promoted and which the False Fatima Apparitions file identifies as part of the “ecumenism project” opening “the way to religious relativism.” There is no mention of the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass offered for the repose of the soul, no mention of Purgatory, no mention of the Particular Judgment, no invocation of the Communion of Saints in its doctrinal fullness. The Peruvian “Bishops’ Conference” speaks of the deceased having “departed for the House of the Heavenly Father” and asks “the Lord of Life to welcome into His Kingdom of light and peace the man who was a dedicated servant of His Church.” This is Protestantized, universalist rhetoric that presumes salvation without reference to the state of grace, the necessity of the Sacraments, or the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus. It is the “laicism” condemned by Pius XI in Quas Primas: “the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations… the Christian religion began to be equated with other false religions and shamelessly placed in the same category.”
The “Bishops’ Conference”: Collegiality as Usurpation of Divine Constitution
The very existence of a “Peruvian Bishops’ Conference” issuing joint statements manifests the heresy of collegiality, which teaches that the college of bishops possesses supreme authority over the universal Church together with the pope—a doctrine that destroys the monarchical constitution established by Christ. The Syllabus of Errors (Prop. 23) condemns the proposition that “Roman pontiffs and ecumenical councils have wandered outside the limits of their powers, have usurped the rights of princes, and have even erred in defining matters of faith and morals”—yet the conciliar sect institutionalizes this usurpation through permanent “conferences” that function as a parallel magisterium, diluting the Petrine primacy into a democratic parliament of “bishops.” The statement “joins in prayer” is a purely horizontal, human gesture, devoid of the vertical authority of the True Church.
Symptomatic Level: The Abomination of Desolation in Action
This event—the death of a Novus Ordo “archbishop,” the condolence of an antipope, the appointment of a “coadjutor,” the “bishops’ conference” communiqué, the planned “papal visit”—is the liturgy of the counter-church. It is a carefully staged spectacle designed to simulate Catholic vitality while the supernatural organism has been evacuated. The False Fatima Apparitions file describes the “disinformation strategy” of the Masonic operation: “Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” We are now in the final stage: the open parading of a false hierarchy, false sacraments, and a false gospel. The “Apostolic Blessing” imparted by Prevost is a simulation; a layman cannot impart the papal blessing. The “visit” to Cusco on November 15 will be a media event, not a pastoral visitation by a true Successor of Peter.
The Kingship of Christ vs. The Republic of Man
Pius XI in Quas Primas instituted the Feast of Christ the King precisely to combat the plague described in this article: “the secularism of our times, so-called laicism, its errors and wicked endeavors.” He wrote: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The conciliar sect, in its every action, derives its authority from men—from media consensus, from diplomatic recognition, from the “bishops’ conferences,” from the “synodal” process. It has no divine mandate. The true Catholic response to the death of a bishop is not a press release from an antipope, but the Missa pro defunctis celebrated by a valid priest, the chanting of the Dies Irae, the invocation of the Saints, the plea for mercy at the Particular Judgment. The silence of the article on these realities is the loudest condemnation of the conciliar sect: it has nothing to offer the dying but humanitarian platitudes.
Conclusion: Return to the Catacombs of Tradition
The faithful Catholic, confronting this spectacle, must recognize that the structures occupying the Vatican are the “abomination of desolation standing in the holy place” (Matt. 24:15). The “Archbishop” of Cusco, the “Coadjutor,” the “Bishops’ Conference,” the “Pope” Leo XIV—all are elements of a vast, paramasonic counterfeit designed to lead souls to hell under the guise of Catholic charity. Non praevalebunt (they shall not prevail). The True Church endures in the catacombs of Tradition, where valid bishops and priests preserve the Missale Romanum of St. Pius V, the unaltered Sacraments, the integral Faith, and the Social Kingship of Christ. Let the dead bury their dead (Matt. 8:22); we must cleave to the Rock of Peter, which is not in the Vatican apartments but wherever the true Faith is professed and the true Sacrifice offered.
Source:
Pope Leo mourns Archbishop Richard Alarcón of Cusco (vaticannews.va)
Date: 31.10.2026