Vatican News portal reports that the usurper Robert Prevost, styling himself “Pope Leo XIV,” addressed a gathering of Christian and non-Christian religious leaders at the Palacio San Martín in Buenos Aires on 9 November 2026, during his self-styled “Apostolic Journey” to South America. The antipope called for interreligious dialogue, “human fraternity,” and a shared commitment to “human dignity, freedom, and hope,” invoking the memory of his predecessor Jorge Bergoglio and the Second Vatican Council’s declaration Nostra Aetate. He declared that religions “were never a cause of division, but rather a meeting point and a source of commitment to society,” and described them as “guardians of human dignity, expressions of freedom, and places in which hope can be cultivated.” This spectacle is the quintessential manifestation of the conciliar sect’s apostasy: the substitution of the Social Kingship of Christ the King with a Masonic humanitarianism that reduces the supernatural religion of the Cross to a naturalistic tool for worldly peace.
The Antipope as Architect of the Masonic “Human Fraternity” Agenda
The address delivered by Prevost in Buenos Aires reads like a manifesto of the Masonic “Human Fraternity” project launched by Bergoglio and the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar in Abu Dhabi (2019). The vocabulary is tellingly identical: “bridges,” “fraternity,” “human dignity,” “freedom,” “hope,” “common good,” “solidarity.” The antipope explicitly anchors his appeal in the “commitment to dialogue and encounter” of Bergoglio, thereby confirming the unbroken continuity of the conciliar revolution from John XXIII through Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Bergoglio, and now Prevost. This is not a “pontificate” but a single, unbroken Masonic occupation of the Holy See.
The choice of venue — the Palacio San Martín, a secular government palace — and the audience — a motley assembly of “Christian communities and representatives of other religious traditions” — symbolize the complete capitulation of the conciliar sect to the secular state and to religious indifferentism. The antipope does not summon these men to convert to the one true Church; he validates their false sects as legitimate “guardians of human dignity.” This is the error of indifferentism condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus Errorum (1864): “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation, and arrive at eternal salvation” (Error 16), and “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion, in which form it is given to please God equally as in the Catholic Church” (Error 18). Prevost’s speech is a practical application of these condemned propositions.
Reduction of Religion to Naturalistic Humanitarianism: The Death of the Supernatural
The most damning aspect of the address is its total silence on the supernatural order. Not a word is spoken of the gloria Dei, the salvation of souls, the necessity of baptism (extra Ecclesiam nulla salus), the kingship of Christ over nations, the reality of sin, hell, or final judgment. Religion is stripped of its divine essence and reduced to three purely horizontal functions: “guardians of human dignity, expressions of freedom, and places in which hope can be cultivated.” This is the laicism condemned by Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925): “the secularism of our times, so-called laicism, its errors and wicked endeavors… began with the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations.” The antipope’s “religions” are no longer societies instituted by God for the worship of the Trinity and the sanctification of men; they are NGOs for the promotion of UN sustainable development goals.
The antipope’s invocation of religare (“to bind or connect”) as the essence of religion is a classic Modernist distortion. St. Thomas Aquinas teaches that religion is a virtue of justice rendering to God the worship due to Him (Summa Theologiae II-II, q. 81). The Modernist, following Schleiermacher and the condemned propositions of Lamentabili Sane Exitu (1907), reduces religion to a subjective “feeling of dependence” or a social bonding mechanism. Proposition 59 of Lamentabili condemns the idea that “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement, applied or applicable to different times and places.” Prevost’s “religions as expressions of freedom” is precisely this: a denial of the absolute, immutable truth of the Catholic Faith.
The Blasphemy of Equating False Cults with the Bride of Christ
The antipope states: “He reaffirmed the bonds uniting Christians through baptism, the Church’s spiritual ties with the Jewish people and its respect for what is ‘holy and true’ in other religious traditions, recalling the Second Vatican Council’s declaration Nostra Aetate.” This is the heresy of false ecumenism. The “bonds uniting Christians through baptism” are real but imperfect; they are a call to full communion in the Catholic Church, not a validation of schism and heresy as parallel paths. As for the “Jewish people,” the Council of Florence (Cantate Domino, 1442) declares that the Mosaic Law ceased with the promulgation of the Gospel, and that those who observe it after the passion of Christ “cannot be saved.” The “respect for what is holy and true in other religious traditions” is the Nostra Aetate error that treats elements of truth in false religions as if they were salvific paths, ignoring that “there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12), cited by Pius XI in Quas Primas (footnote 29).
The antipope’s claim that “Religions were never a cause of division, but rather a meeting point and a source of commitment to society” is a historical lie and a theological absurdity. The false religions — Islam, Judaism, Protestantism, paganism — are divisions from the unity of the Church, caused by heresy, schism, or infidelity. They are not “meeting points” but obstacles to the unitas fidei which is the mark of the true Church. Pope Pius XI in Mortalium Animos (1928) condemned the “pan-Christian” movement that seeks unity by compromising doctrine: “The unity of the Church can only arise from one teaching authority, one law of belief, and one faith.” Prevost’s “dialogue” is the dialogue of the Antichrist, preparing the one-world religion of the Masonic New World Order.
The “Defense of Life” as a Secular Human Rights Slogan
The antipope urges believers to “defend life ‘from conception to its natural end'” and warns against “the idols of domination, vainglory and war.” While the words sound Catholic, the context empties them of supernatural meaning. In the mouth of a manifest heretic who denies the Social Kingship of Christ and promotes religious indifferentism, “defense of life” becomes a mere human rights slogan, detached from the lex divina and the lex ecclesiastica. The Syllabus condemns the error that “Moral laws do not stand in need of the divine sanction, and it is not at all necessary that human laws should be made conformable to the laws of nature and receive their power of binding from God” (Error 56). Prevost’s “defense of life” is grounded in “human dignity” as an autonomous secular value, not in the rights of God the Creator and Redeemer. This is the “natural religion” condemned by Pius IX: “those who conceived that the divine religion should be replaced by a natural religion, a natural inner impulse” (Syllabus, Introductory text).
The Antipope as Manifest Heretic: Automatic Loss of Office
Robert Prevost, by his public adherence to and promotion of the heresies of Vatican II (religious liberty, false ecumenism, collegiality, the new ecclesiology), and by this very address which embodies the condemned errors of indifferentism and naturalism, is a manifest heretic. According to the unanimous teaching of the Fathers and Doctors, notably St. Robert Bellarmine (De Romano Pontifice), a manifest heretic ipso facto ceases to be Pope because he is no longer a member of the Church, and a non-member cannot be the Head. As Bellarmine states: “A non-Christian in no way can be Pope… he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian… therefore, a manifest heretic cannot be Pope.” (Defense of Sedevacantism file). Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code confirms: “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration… if the cleric publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio declares the elevation of a heretic “null, void, and of no effect.” Prevost’s “papacy” is a juridical nullity; his “apostolic journeys” are the travels of a private individual usurping the Chair of Peter.
The Conciliar Sect as the “Abomination of Desolation” in the Holy Place
The Buenos Aires meeting is a liturgy of the conciliar sect’s false god: Man. The antipope’s closing invocation — “May the Almighty bless our enthusiasm for humanity and inspire our commitment to peace” — reveals the idol. “Enthusiasm for humanity” replaces the amor Dei. “Commitment to peace” replaces the pax Christi in regno Christi. This is the cultus hominis prophesied by St. Paul (2 Thess 2:4) and identified by the sedevacantist analysis as the work of the Masonic “psychological operation” against the Church (False Fatima Apparitions file: “Ecumenism Project… opens the way to religious relativism… can serve to legitimize dialogue with schismatic Orthodoxy”).
The true Church, the Ecclesia militans, does not “build bridges” to false religions; she calls all men to convertimini (Mk 1:15). She does not seek “shared commitment to peace” with the enemies of Christ; she imposes the pax Christi by the gladius Spiritus (Eph 6:17). The faithful remnant, adhering to the immutable Tradition and the valid sacraments administered by bishops and priests of the true apostolic succession (uncontaminated by the doubtful rites of the conciliar sect), must reject this spectacle as a diabolical counterfeit. Non praevalebunt (Mt 16:18). The gates of hell shall not prevail against the Church of Christ, but they have visibly prevailed against the Vatican structures now occupied by the Masonic “Church of the New Advent.”
Conclusion: The Only Remedy is the Restoration of the Kingship of Christ
The Buenos Aires address is not a pastoral act; it is a political act of the Masonic New World Order, delivered by its chief religious functionary. The only remedy for the evils enumerated by the antipope — war, injustice, attacks on life, environmental degradation — is the one he systematically excludes: the public recognition of the Social Kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ over all nations, laws, and institutions, as taught by Pius XI in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” The conciliar sect, by its very nature, cannot proclaim this Kingship, for it has dethroned Christ to enthrone Man. Viva Cristo Rey!
Source:
Pope in Buenos Aires: Religions must build bridges, not division (vaticannews.va)
Date: 09.11.2026