The Vatican News portal reports on the first day of the usurper Robert Prevost, styling himself “Pope Leo XIV,” in Peru, where he previously functioned as a conciliar “bishop” of Chiclayo. The account details his arrival at Callao Air Base, a meeting with President Keiko Fujimori, an address to civil authorities at the Grand National Theatre, and an evening appearance on the balcony of the Apostolic Nunciature where he declared, “I have returned home. Here I am at home,” requested prayers for “peace” and “unity in our own families,” led the Our Father, and imparted a “blessing.” This theatrical display of naturalistic sentimentality and political courting, utterly devoid of the supernatural mission of the Church, confirms the complete apostasy of the conciliar sect’s claimants to the papacy.
The Usurper’s Naturalistic “Homecoming” Versus the Missionary’s Supernatural Mandate
The very phrase “I have returned home. Here I am at home” reveals the thoroughly naturalistic orientation of the conciliar “pope.” A true successor of Peter, sent by Christ to “teach all nations” (Matt. 28:19), knows no earthly patria; his citizenship is in heaven (Phil. 3:20), and his mission is the conquest of souls for the Kingdom of Christ, not the cultivation of comfortable nostalgia for former mission fields. Pius XI, in Quas Primas, teaches that “the Kingdom of Christ encompasses all men… most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ” (Encyclical Annum Sacrum, cited in Quas Primas). The usurper’s language reduces the divine mandate to a sentimental homecoming, indistinguishable from a secular diplomat’s or a retired NGO worker’s return. This is the laicism condemned by Pius XI: “the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations… the Church’s authority to teach men, to issue laws, to govern nations… was denied” (Quas Primas). The conciliar “pope” acts not as Vicar of Christ the King, but as a functionary of a humanistic NGO.
Political Courting of Civil Power: Violation of the Church’s Liberty and the Kingship of Christ
The meeting with President Keiko Fujimori and the address to “civil authorities, representatives of civil society and diplomats” at the Grand National Theatre exemplify the conciliar sect’s subservience to the secular order. The Syllabus of Pius IX condemns the proposition that “The Church is not a true and perfect society, entirely free… but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church” (Error 19). It further condemns: “The ecclesiastical power ought not to exercise its authority without the permission and assent of the civil government” (Error 20). By seeking a platform in a secular theatre before civil authorities, the usurper inverts the divine order: the State must recognize the Kingship of Christ and the Church’s supreme spiritual authority, not the reverse. Pius XI warns: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed” (Quas Primas). The usurper’s address, doubtless filled with vague appeals to “dialogue,” “social justice,” and “common good” stripped of their theological foundation, serves only to legitimize the modern secular state’s usurpation of God’s rights.
The Vacuous Appeal to “Peace” and “Family Unity” Without Christ the King
The usurper’s exhortation to “pray for peace” and to “foster unity in our own families” is a masterpiece of Modernist equivocation. St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu condemns the proposition that “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief” (Prop. 26). The conciliar “pope” offers a pragmatic, horizontal “peace” — pax hominibus — severed from the Pax Christi in Regno Christi. True peace is the tranquillitas ordinis (St. Augustine, De Civ. Dei XIX.13), the order established by the reign of Christ the King over minds, wills, and hearts (Quas Primas). Without the Social Reign of Christ the King, “family unity” is mere natural sentiment, incapable of sustaining the supernatural bond of the Sacrament of Matrimony or the duty of Christian education. The Syllabus condemns: “The civil government… has the right to make enactments regarding the administration of the divine sacraments, and the dispositions necessary for receiving them” (Error 44). The usurper’s silence on the indissolubility of Christian marriage, the necessity of the Sacraments, and the duty of parents to educate children for heaven exposes the naturalistic core of his message.
Simulated Sacraments and the Blasphemy of a False “Blessing”
The report states the usurper “led the crowd in the Our Father and giving his blessing.” This is a grave simulation of sacred rites. The “blessing” of a manifest heretic and usurper of the See of Peter is not a sacramental of the Church but an act of sacrilege. Cum ex Apostolatus Officio (Pope Paul IV) declares that if a Cardinal or the Roman Pontiff “has defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect”. Bellarmine teaches: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member” (De Romano Pontifice 2:30). The “priests” and “bishops” of the conciliar sect, ordained in the invalid Novus Ordo rite (1968) or consecrated by such, lack valid orders and jurisdiction. Their “blessings” are empty gestures. The faithful gathered at the Nunciature, mistaking this antipope for the Vicar of Christ, commit objective idolatry — rendering to a man the honor due to Christ the King alone. Quas Primas insists: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate”. The Peruvians kneeling before the usurper render to Caesar what belongs to God.
The “Missionary” Past: Complicity in the Conciliar Revolution
The article notes the usurper “served for years as an Augustinian missionary and later as Bishop of Chiclayo.” This past is not a credential but an indictment. As a “bishop” of the conciliar sect post-1968, he implemented the Novus Ordo Missae — the “table of assembly” replacing the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary — and the heresies of Dignitatis Humanae (religious liberty), Unitatis Redintegratio (false ecumenism), and Gaudium et Spes (cult of man). St. Pius X condemns the Modernist proposition: “Christ did not intend to establish the Church as a community lasting for centuries on earth… The organic structure of the Church is subject to change… Dogmas, sacraments, and hierarchy… are merely modes of explanation and stages in the evolution of Christian consciousness” (Lamentabili, Props. 52, 53, 54). The usurper’s entire “ministry” has been the propagation of this evolutionist poison in Peru. His “homecoming” is the return of a destroyer of the Faith to survey the ruins.
Symptomatic Analysis: The Conciliar Sect’s Theater of “Closeness”
The balcony scene — the jokes about neighbors wanting “peace of their own,” the “see you tomorrow” — is calculated theater. It mimics the papal style of the false “pope” Francis (Bergoglio), emphasizing parrhesia, “closeness,” “mercy” detached from truth, and a banal familiarity that destroys the mysterium tremendum of the Petrine office. This is the democratization of the Church condemned by Pius XI: the reduction of the King of Kings’ Vicar to a “man of the people.” The Quas Primas feast was instituted precisely to combat this: “The annual celebration of this solemnity will also remind states that not only private individuals, but also rulers and governments have the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him”. The usurper’s performance in Peru is the antithesis: a reminder that the conciliar sect honors only man.
Conclusion: Peru Must Reject the Usurper and Return to Christ the King
The visit of Robert Prevost to Peru is not a pastoral event but a political operation of the abomination of desolation (Matt. 24:15) occupying the Vatican. It seeks to consolidate the conciliar sect’s hold on a nation once Catholic, now ravaged by liberation theology, Pentecostalism, and secularism — all fruits of the post-conciliar apostasy. The only remedy for Peru, as for all nations, is the Social Reign of Christ the King: the public profession of the Catholic Faith, the restoration of the Traditional Latin Mass and the pre-1958 sacramental rites, the rejection of religious liberty and false ecumenism, and submission to bishops and priests of valid orders and jurisdiction who maintain the integral Catholic faith without compromise. “You are Christ the King of glory!” — this acclamation, sung at the Nicaea centenary in 1925 (Quas Primas), must drown out the cheers for the usurper. Non praevalebunt (Matt. 16:18).
Source:
Pope Leo thanks Peru for its warm welcome: "I am at home here" (vaticannews.va)
Date: 11.11.2026