The EWTN News portal reports that the provincial municipality of Callao, Peru, has unveiled a 14-meter (45-foot) statue of the usurper Robert Prevost, known in the conciliar sect as “Pope Leo XIV,” in the newly named “Niño Gaelito Park.” The monument, funded by the financial institution Caja Huancayo and crafted from polyurethane foam, fiberglass, and polyester resin with a marble-like finish, stands upon a 2-meter pedestal. The ceremony was presided over by Callao’s mayor Cesar Perez, accompanied by the conciliar “bishop” Luis Alberto Barrera Pacheco and “Monsignor” Guillermo Inca Pereda, deputy secretary of the Peruvian “Bishops’ Conference.” The municipality explicitly stated the sculpture expresses “pride, gratitude, and faith of the people of Callao for someone whose evangelizing efforts made a profound impact in our diocese.” This grotesque apotheosis of a living man, a manifest heretic occupying the Chair of Peter by virtue of a simulated election, constitutes not merely an excess of piety but a formal act of idolatry, enthroning the creature in the place of the Creator and sealing the neo-church’s definitive apostasy from the regnum Christi (Kingdom of Christ).
The Cult of the Antipope: Idolatry Masquerading as Gratitude
The erection of a colossal statue to a living claimant to the papacy is without precedent in the history of the Church prior to the conciliar revolution. It reveals the anthropocentric inversion at the heart of the neo-church: the homo Dei (man of God) has been replaced by the deus hominis (god of man). Pius XI, in Quas Primas, thundered that “the hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior” and instituted the Feast of Christ the King precisely to combat the “secularism of our times, so-called laicism, its errors and wicked endeavors.” That encyclical declared: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The statue in Callao is the monumental embodiment of this destruction. It is not Christ the King who reigns in Callao’s new park, but Robert Prevost, a man who, by his public adherence to the heresies of Vatican II — religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality, the new mass — has ipso facto severed himself from the Mystical Body of Christ. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches, cited in the Defense of Sedevacantism: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member; now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian.” To honor such a one with a statue is to honor the revolt against Christ.
The “Evangelization” That Merits a Monument: A False Gospel
The municipality credits Prevost with “evangelizing efforts [that] made a profound impact.” What gospel? The gospel of the conciliar sect is a false gospel. As Pius IX condemned in the Syllabus of Errors (Prop. 18): “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion, in which form it is given to please God equally as in the Catholic Church.” This indifferentism is the very operating principle of the neo-church’s “evangelization.” Prevost, as “bishop of Chiclayo” and “apostolic administrator of Callao,” implemented the post-conciliar revolution: the Novus Ordo Missae (a Protestantized memorial meal), the new Code of Canon Law (which subverts the Church’s divine constitution), and the false ecumenism that places the one true Church on par with schismatic and heretical sects. The Lamentabili Sane Exitu of St. Pius X condemned the Modernist proposition that “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement, applied or applicable to different times and places” (Prop. 59). This is the “evangelization” celebrated in bronze-colored foam: the proclamation of a mutable, adaptable, man-centered religious experience, not the immutable depositum fidei. The statue honors the destroyer of the Faith in Peru, not its propagator.
Invalid “Bishops” Consecrating an Invalid Cult
The presence of “Bishop” Luis Alberto Barrera Pacheco and “Monsignor” Guillermo Inca Pereda at the unveiling is not incidental; it is essential. These men are functionaries of the secta conciliaris, ordained and consecrated in the doubtful rites of Paul VI (1968), which omitted the essential form and intention for the sacrament of Order. As the Defense of Sedevacantism establishes, citing Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio: “…if at any time it shall appear that any Bishop… or any Cardinal… or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion… has defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect.” The lineage of the Peruvian hierarchy traces back to the usurpers John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, and now Leo XIV — all manifest heretics who, by Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code, “Publicly defects from the Catholic faith” and thus lose all jurisdiction ipso facto. These “bishops” have no authority to teach, govern, or sanctify. Their participation in this ceremony is the participation of laymen in an act of public idolatry, lending the veneer of “ecclesiastical” approval to the worship of a man. The silence of the article regarding the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Sacraments, the state of grace, or the Final Judgment — the very raison d’être of the Church — is the loudest testimony: the neo-church is a purely horizontal, naturalistic NGO.
The Masonic Signature: Monumentalism and the Cult of Personality
The False Fatima Apparitions document identifies the Masonic modus operandi: “Symbolism of dates: 1717 (founding of Freemasonry), 1917 (apparitions), 2017 (canonization) – ritualistic 200-year cycles.” The erection of colossal statues to living leaders is a hallmark of totalitarian and Masonic regimes — Saddam Hussein, Kim Il-sung, Atatürk. It serves the “disinformation strategy” described in that document: “Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” Today, the narrative is the apotheosis of the “pope” as a global celebrity, a “man of the people,” a humanitarian icon. The statue in Callao, funded by a financial institution (Caja Huancayo), unveiled by a politician (Mayor Perez), and blessed by a “bishop,” is the perfect synthesis of the civitas terrena usurping the civitas Dei. The park itself is named after a child hero of natural virtue (rescuing his sister from fire), not a saint of supernatural charity. The natural supersedes the supernatural. This is the “laicism” Pius XI condemned: “the divine religion should be replaced by a natural religion, a natural inner impulse.”
EWTN: The Propaganda Arm of the Abomination
The article originates from EWTN News / National Catholic Register, the flagship media of the neo-church’s “conservative” wing. Its role is to normalize the revolution, to make the unprecedented seem pious, the heretical seem orthodox. By reporting this idolatrous spectacle as a heartwarming story of “faith” and “gratitude,” EWTN performs the function identified in the False Fatima Apparitions document: “Globalization of the cult and control of the narrative.” It frames the statue as an expression of the “people’s faith,” thereby baptizing the cult of personality. There is no critical voice, no reference to the theological impossibility of a heretic being Pope, no citation of Quas Primas or the Syllabus. Only the bureaucratic language of the “municipality,” the “bishops’ conference,” the “apostolic administrator.” This is the “cautious, bureaucratic language” that masks the abyss. The article notes Prevost’s visit includes an audience with “President Keiko Fujimori” and an address at the “Grand National Theater.” The King of Kings is excluded from the Government Palace and the Theater; the usurper is feted. “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ,” commanded Pius XI. In Peru, the rulers venerate the antipope.
The Theological Verdict: Non Est Papa
From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, grounded in the immutable Magisterium prior to 1958, the situation is juridically and theologically certain. Robert Prevost (“Leo XIV”) is a manifest heretic. By the principle haereticus non est Christianus (a heretic is not a Christian), he is not a member of the Church. By the principle caput non potest esse qui non est membrum (he cannot be head who is not a member), he cannot be Pope. By Canon 188.4, he has tacitly resigned any office he might have held by public defection from the Faith. By Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, his “elevation” is “null, void, and of no effect.” The statue in Callao is therefore not a monument to a Pope, but a monument to a usurper, an idol raised in the sight of heaven by a sect that has apostatized from the King of Kings. The faithful Catholic, sine qua non, must reject this spectacle, recognizing in it the abominatio desolationis spoken of by Daniel and Our Lord. The only “statue” worthy of veneration is the Cross of Christ, and the only “park” where He reigns is the heart converted to His regnum veritatis et vitae, regnum sanctitatis et gratiae, regnum iustitiae, amoris et pacis (kingdom of truth and life, kingdom of holiness and grace, kingdom of justice, love, and peace). The foam colossus of Callao will crumble; the Kingdom of Christ shall have no end.
Source:
A 45-Foot Statue of Pope Leo XIV Is Unveiled in Peru in Time for His Arrival (ncregister.com)
Date: 11.11.2026