The EWTN News portal reports on the latest theatrical deployment of the usurper Robert Prevost, styling himself “Leo XIV,” to Peru — the land where he previously functioned as a conciliar “bishop” of Chiclayo. The article, dated November 12, 2026, documents a choreographed itinerary: meetings with the Peruvian “episcopate,” a “midday prayer” at the Cathedral Basilica of St. John the Apostle and Evangelist in Lima, a “public meeting with leaders and citizens,” and a “prayer vigil with youth” at the National Stadium. The piece drips with the sentimentalism characteristic of the neo-church, highlighting the “emotional return” and the “poignant” nature of the visit, while “Pope Leo XIV waves to the crowds gathered outside the archbishop’s palace in Lima, Peru, before meeting with Peruvian bishops on Nov. 12, 2026.” This spectacle is not a pastoral visit; it is the public manifestation of the abomination of desolation standing where it ought not (Matt. 24:15), a brazen assertion of the paramasonic structure’s occupation of the visible patrimony of the Church in a nation once fertilized by the blood of true martyrs.
The Usurper’s Itinerary: A Theater of Legitimacy for a Vacant See
The article functions as a press release for the great imposture. It meticulously records the movements of Mr. Robert Prevost — a man validly ordained (presumably) before the satanic novelties of the 1968 Pontificale Romanum, yet who has spent his entire “ministry” within the conciliar sect, ascending its hierarchy to the “episcopate” in 2015 under the usurper Bergoglio — as if he were the Vicar of Christ. The caption “Pope Leo XIV meets with Peruvian bishops on Nov. 12, 2026, at the archbishop’s palace in Lima, Peru” reveals the internal logic of the neo-church: a collegiality of usurpers validating each other’s simulated jurisdiction. St. Robert Bellarmine teaches that a manifest heretic “by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church” (De Romano Pontifice). Since the conciliar “popes” from John XXIII onward have publicly professed the heresies of religious liberty, ecumenism, and collegiality — condemned by the Syllabus of Pius IX and Quanta Cura, by Pascendi of St. Pius X, and by Mortalium Animos of Pius XI — they are ipso facto severed from the Church, incapable of holding office (Canon 188 §4, 1917 Code; Cum ex Apostolatus Officio of Paul IV). The “bishops” meeting with Prevost are likewise non-members of the Church, having defected from the faith by their adherence to the Second Vatican Council and its anti-syllabus. Their gathering is not an episcopal synod but a conventicle of the synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2:9).
Profanation of the Cathedral: The “Midday Prayer” as Liturgical Nullity
The article notes: “Pope Leo XIV delivers his homily during the midday prayer at the Cathedral Basilica of St. John the Apostle and Evangelist in Lima, Peru, Nov. 12, 2026.” This is a sacrilegious farce. A cathedral is consecrated for the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary, the Most Holy Sacrifice of the True Mass. The “midday prayer” — a product of the Liturgy of the Hours reformed by the Masonic architect Bugnini — is a Protestantized office, stripped of the propitiatory character of the Divine Office as codified by St. Pius V and St. Pius X. When a manifest heretic, an antipope, enters a consecrated cathedral not to offer the Holy Sacrifice but to preside over a fabricated “prayer service,” he commits idolatry in the very sanctuary of God. Pius XI in Quas Primas declared: “The state must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders and Congregations… who are indeed the most valiant helpers of the Pastors of the Church and contribute most to the expansion and establishment of Christ’s Kingdom.” The neo-church “clergy” in that cathedral are not pastors of the Church but hirelings who have fled (John 10:12). The “homily” delivered by Prevost is not the teaching of Christ the King but the babbling of a false prophet, for “he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian… therefore, a manifest heretic cannot be Pope” (Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice 2:30).
The “Public Meeting”: Submission to Secular Power, Betrayal of Christ’s Kingship
The article describes: “Pope Leo XIV listens during a public meeting with leaders and citizens on the challenges and hopes of the Peruvian people in Lima, Peru, Nov. 12, 2026.” Here the essence of the conciliar revolution is laid bare: the “pope” listens to “leaders and citizens” — the civil authority, the vox populi — as if the Church were a NGO seeking consensus. Pius IX in the Syllabus condemned the proposition: “The civil government, even when in the hands of an infidel sovereign, has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41). He condemned: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55). Pius XI in Quas Primas thundered: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… For when God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The antipope’s “dialogue” with Peruvian civil leaders is high treason against the Kingship of Christ. He does not command; he dialogues. He does not condemn the abortion laws, the divorce laws, the Masonic control of Peruvian institutions; he listens to challenges and hopes. This is the cult of man replacing the cultus Dei. The “leaders and citizens” are not summoned to subdere se Deo (submit to God) but are flattered as partners. Non est hic Deus (Judges 6:13).
The Youth Vigil: Emotionalism as Substitute for Grace
The article climaxes with: “Pope Leo XIV grows emotional during a prayer vigil with youth at National Stadium in Lima, Peru on Nov. 12, 2026.” A stadium. Not a church. A “prayer vigil” — the neo-church’s staple substitute for the Holy Sacrifice and Eucharistic Adoration. The antipope grows emotional. Sentimentalism replaces sanctity. St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane exitu condemned the Modernist proposition: “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief” (Prop. 26). The stadium vigil is pure pragmatism: manufacture an “experience,” elicit tears, create a memory — opus operatum of the neo-church’s psychological engineering. The youth are not fed with the Bread of Angels; they are fed emotional pabulum. The “Peruvian dancers” performing for the antipope (mentioned in the lead photo caption) signify the inculturation of the profane: pagan ritual dance imported into the presence of the Blasphemer. Pius XII in Mediator Dei warned against “the introduction of profane elements into the liturgy.” Here the liturgy is entirely profane. The stadium becomes the new golden calf, the antipope its Aaron, the youth its worshippers. “They have made them a molten calf… and have worshipped it” (Exod. 32:8).
EWTN: The Propaganda Arm of the Neo-Church
The source, EWTN News, describes itself as “a team of journalists dedicated to reporting news concerning the Catholic Church around the world.” This is a lie. EWTN reports on the conciliar sect as if it were the Catholic Church. It uses the honorifics “Holy Father,” “papacy,” “papal trip,” “bishops,” “Cathedral Basilica” without the necessary quotation marks that denote simulated reality. It is the Pravda of the paramasonic structure. The article’s related links — “Pope Leo XIV urges Peru to embrace Catholic social teaching for a better society” — expose the naturalistic reductionism of the neo-church: “Catholic social teaching” becomes a recipe for a “better society” (temporal welfare), not the salus animarum. Pius XI in Quas Primas taught: “The state is happy not by one means, and man by another; for the state is nothing else than a harmonious association of men.” True happiness comes only from subjection to Christ the King. The neo-church offers social engineering without the Supernatural.
The Theological Verdict: Sede Vacante Confirmed by the Fruits
The visit of Robert Prevost to Peru is not a papal visit. It is the tour of a layman (having lost the clerical state by manifest heresy and schism, per Canon 188 §4 and Bellarmine) dressed in white, acclaimed by a hierarchy of apostates, reported by a media apparatus of the Antichrist. The “Cathedral Basilica” is physically the same building consecrated for the True Mass, but juridically and mystically it is occupied territory. The “bishops” are intruders. The “youth” are victims of a soul-destroying deception. The “civil leaders” are confirmed in their secularist impiety by the antipope’s refusal to demand their conversion.
Pius IX, Syllabus Error 80: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.” Condemned. Prevost does exactly this. St. Pius X, Pascendi: Modernism is “the synthesis of all heresies.” The conciliar sect is Modernism institutionalized. Bellarmine: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member.” The Chair of Peter is vacant. The See of Rome is occupied by an antipope. The structures in the Vatican are the abomination of desolation.
“Pope Leo XIV waves to the crowds gathered outside the archbishop’s palace in Lima, Peru, before meeting with Peruvian bishops on Nov. 12, 2026.”
This single image encapsulates the entire imposture: a false pope, a false archbishop’s palace (the true Archbishop of Lima, if one exists in the catacombs, is excluded), false bishops, false crowds (Catholics deceived into acclaiming an antipope). Woe to them that call evil good, and good evil (Isa. 5:20). The true Church in Peru endures in the catacombs, among the faithful who reject the neo-church, who keep the True Mass, the true faith, the true obedience to Christ the King. “The Kingdom of Christ… encompasses all men… most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ” (Pius XI, Quas Primas, citing Leo XIII). Not to the authority of Robert Prevost. Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus imperat. The usurper’s spectacle in Lima is dust and ashes.
Source:
PHOTOS: Pope Leo XIV returns to Peru where he once served as bishop (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 13.11.2026