The EWTN News portal (via its National Catholic Register partner) reports on the August 20, 2026 ruling of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upholding a ban on statues of St. Michael the Archangel and St. Florian from a public safety building in Quincy, declaring such display an unconstitutional “government preferential treatment of a particular religion.” The article frames the decision as a contested legal battle, quoting the ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State celebrating a victory for “religious freedom and church-state separation,” while the city’s lawyers from the Becket law group vow to appeal. This reporting exposes the total capitulation of the conciliar sect’s media apparatus to the Masonic dogma of *laïcité*: instead of condemning the ruling as a direct violation of the Social Kingship of Christ, it presents the suppression of Catholic truth in the public square as a neutral legal dispute.
The Conciliar Press as Propagandist for the Secularist State
The cited article does not merely report; it legitimizes. By giving equal weight to the plaintiffs’ celebration of “neutrality” and the city’s plea for “public art,” the National Catholic Register adopts the very framework of the anti-Christian revolution: that the State is the supreme arbiter of truth, and religion a private hobby to be quarantined from public life. This is the laïcité condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (Error 55: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church”) and by Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The Register’s silence on this papal teaching is not an omission; it is complicity. It functions as a house organ for the civitas diaboli, normalizing the expulsion of Christ the King from the city He redeemed.
The City’s “Secular Purpose” Argument: Apostasy in Legal Briefs
The city’s defense—that the statues serve a “secular purpose” by honoring police and firefighters via their patron saints—is a theological abomination. It reduces the Prince of the Heavenly Hosts and a martyr of the early Church to mere mascots for municipal employees. This is the naturalismus condemned by the Syllabus (Error 3: “Human reason, without any reference whatsoever to God, is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood…”). By arguing that St. Michael and St. Florian are “also honored by other religious traditions,” the city’s lawyers implicitly deny the unica salus of the Catholic Church and the unique mediation of the saints in the Communion of Saints. They have adopted the Masonic lie that all religions are equal paths to the same generic deity. No true Catholic official would ever concede that the veneration due to the saints can be translated into “secular honor.” To do so is to prostitute the heavenly court before the tribunal of Caesar.
Becket Law Group: Defending “Religious Liberty,” the Heresy of Heresies
The Becket law group, hailed in conciliar circles as a defender of “religious freedom,” is in reality the legal arm of the Americanist heresy. The Syllabus condemns the proposition that “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true” (Error 15). Vatican Council I and the constant Magisterium teach that libertas conscientiae in the liberal sense is a pestifera erroris—a pestilential error—because it places the creature’s autonomy above the Creator’s rights. By framing the case as a defense of Quincy’s “right to honor its heroes,” Becket argues on the terrain of the enemy: the dignitas humana severed from veritas revelata. They do not argue that the State must honor the saints because Christ is King; they argue that the State may permit it as a matter of “free speech” or “historical tradition.” This is surrender disguised as strategy.
The Judicial Usurpation of Christ’s Kingship
The Massachusetts court’s reasoning—that the statues “could be viewed by the public as endorsement of a particular religion, and thus subordination of others”—inverts the divine order. Quas Primas declares: “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The court claims the State must be “neutral” toward religion; the Pope teaches the State must be submissive to the true Religion. The court fears “subordination of others”; the Syllabus condemns the error that “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41). By what authority does a secular tribunal declare the King of Kings a “sectarian symbol”? By the authority of the Masonic lodges that have governed Massachusetts since the Revolution. The conciliar media’s failure to denounce this usurpation as crimen laesae majestatis Divinae proves its allegiance to the novus ordo saeculorum, not the Regnum Christi.
The Statues Themselves: Idols of the Civic Religion
Even the statues, as conceived by Mayor Koch, are not Catholic sacramentals but civic totems. They were “chosen to honor the courage and sacrifice” of first responders—not to invoke the intercession of the saints, not to remind the populace of the Last Judgment, not to proclaim Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus imperat. They are simulacra of piety, drained of supernatural intent, designed to be palatable to a pluralistic populace. This is the religio civilis of Rousseau and the French Revolution: saints stripped of their halo, retained only as moral exemplars for the Republic. Better the statues remain in storage than stand as monuments to the Church’s surrender to the world. Their removal is a judgment of God upon a clergy and laity that have forgotten Non est potestas nisi a Deo (Rom 13:1).
The Conciliar Sect’s “Legal Strategy”: Collaboration with the Antichrist
The article notes the case may go to the U.S. Supreme Court. The conciliar hierarchy, through surrogates like Becket, will there argue Kennedy v. Bremerton precedents, “history and tradition” tests, and “government speech” doctrines—all frameworks constructed by a Masonic judiciary to manage religion’s containment. They will not argue Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, nor Quas Primas, nor the Syllabus. They cannot, because the “pope” they recognize (Leo XIV, Robert Prevost) has himself endorsed the “religious freedom” heresy at the United Nations and in Fratelli Tutti. The conciliar sect does not seek the Crown Rights of Christ; it seeks a seat at the table of the Antichrist. Every appeal to the “Constitution” is a rejection of the Constitutio Divina of the Church.
Silence on the Only Remedy: The Social Kingship of Christ
Nowhere in the article—nor in the statements of Mayor Koch, the Becket attorneys, or the Register’s reporter—is there a whisper of the only solution taught by the immutable Magisterium: the explicit, legal, public recognition of Jesus Christ as King of the nation, with the Catholic Church as the State’s established religion, and the suppression of public idolatry. Pius XI commanded: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate and contribute to the increase of their homeland’s happiness.” The conciliar media hides this teaching because it exposes their entire post-conciliar project—ecumenism, religious liberty, interreligious dialogue—as high treason against the King of Kings.
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation in the Public Square
The empty pedestals in Quincy are a sign of the times. The statues’ removal is not a defeat for “Catholic representation”; it is the logical fruit of a Church that has ceased to teach Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus and begun to negotiate “space” in the Masonic city of man. The National Catholic Register’s anodyne reporting is the voice of the falsa ecclesia whispering Pax, pax, et non est pax (Jer 6:14). True Catholics know that Non praevalebunt (Mt 16:18) applies to the gates of hell, not to the courts of Massachusetts. The remedy is not a Supreme Court appeal, but the restoration of the Catholic State—a restoration the conciliar sect will fight to its last breath, for it serves the Prince of this World.
Source:
Massachusetts high court rules against saints statues (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 21.08.2026