Vatican News, the official propaganda organ of the conciliar sect occupying the Vatican, reports a private audience granted by the usurper Robert Prevost (“Pope Leo XIV”) to Pavlo Honcharuk, the conciliar “Bishop of Kharkiv-Zaporizhzhia,” on September 11, 2026. The piece reads like a press release for a humanitarian NGO: the “bishop” thanks the antipope for “prayers,” “concern,” “help in freeing prisoners,” and diplomatic “arsenal” deployed to end the conflict; the antipope assures him “everything is being done to bring this war to an end.” Not a single word is uttered about the Social Kingship of Christ, the necessity of conversion for true peace, the rights of God violated by the atheistic aggression, or the salvation of souls. This encounter is not a pastoral act of the Catholic Church but a staged photo-op of the abomination of desolation (Matt. 24:15), confirming that the neo-church has definitively substituted the regnum Christi for a Masonic “fraternity” of naturalistic philanthropy.
The Usurper on the Throne: Sede Vacante Since 1958
The article centers on “Pope Leo XIV,” the latest in the line of antipopes beginning with the Modernist Angelo Roncalli (John XXIII). As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches, “A manifest heretic, by that very fact, ceases to be Pope and head… just as he ceases to be a Christian and a member of the body of the Church” (De Romano Pontifice, lib. 2, cap. 30). The “Defense of Sedevacantism” file confirms that Bellarmine’s fifth opinion — that a Pope who falls into manifest heresy loses his office ipso facto, without any declaratory sentence — is the common teaching of the Fathers. The “Cum ex Apostolatus Officio” of Pope Paul IV (1559) declares the promotion of a heretic to the papacy “null, void, and of no effect” even if unanimously elected. Since the conciliar “popes” have publicly professed the heresies of religious liberty, false ecumenism, and collegiality — condemned by the Syllabus of Pius IX and Pascendi Dominici Gregis of St. Pius X — they are not true Vicars of Christ but usurpers of the Holy See. To call Prevost “Pope” is to blaspheme the Papacy; he is an antipope, a layman masquerading as the Successor of Peter.
The Conciliar “Bishop”: A Functionary of the Neo-Church
Pavlo Honcharuk is presented as “Bishop of Kharkiv-Zaporizhzhia.” In reality, he is a functionary of the conciliar hierarchy, ordained and consecrated in the invalid post-1968 rites, within a structure that has abandoned the Catholic Faith. The 1917 Code (Canon 188.4) states that an office becomes vacant ipso facto by “public defection from the Catholic faith.” The “Defense of Sedevacantism” file cites Fr. McDevitt: “joining a non-Catholic sect is not required to establish the publicity which the canon demands”; formal heresy suffices. By adhering to the Vatican II sect — which teaches religious liberty (condemned in Quanta Cura and the Syllabus, error 15), ecumenism (error 18), and the separation of Church and State (error 55) — Honcharuk has defected from the Faith. He possesses no jurisdiction, no sacramental authority, and no mission from Christ. He is a blind leader of the blind (Matt. 15:14).
Reduction of the Church’s Mission to Naturalistic Humanitarianism
The entire dialogue reported by Vatican News revolves around temporal welfare: “freeing prisoners,” “bringing children home,” “safeguarding human lives,” “diplomatic arsenal,” “psychologist,” “chaplaincy commission.” This is the heresy of humanitarianism, the practical denial of the Kingship of Christ over nations. Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925) thundered: “When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken.” He instituted the Feast of Christ the King precisely to combat “the secularism of our times, so-called laicism.” The antipope and his “bishop” have achieved that secularism: they speak as functionaries of a secular power, using the vocabulary of the United Nations, not the language of the Gospel. They have “no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12) on their lips — only “God’s love” stripped of dogma, grace, and the Cross.
Peace Without Christ: The Peace of the World, Not of God
Honcharuk claims the antipope said “everything is being done to bring this war to an end” and that this helps “understand that we are not alone.” But Our Lord said: “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36) and “Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, do I give unto you” (John 14:27). The “peace” negotiated by the conciliar sect is the pax Romana of the Masonic city of man — a mere cessation of hostilities that leaves the reign of Satan intact. The Syllabus (error 80) condemns the proposition: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.” The antipope’s “diplomatic arsenal” is precisely this reconciliation with the world. True peace is tranquillitas ordinis — the tranquility of order — which requires the subjection of all things to Christ the King. As Pius XI wrote: “If men were ever to recognize Christ’s royal authority over themselves, both privately and publicly, then unheard-of blessings would flow upon the whole society, such as due freedom, order, and tranquility, and concord and peace.” The neo-church offers the world’s peace; the Catholic Church offers Christ’s peace.
Silence on the Supernatural Order: The Gravest Accusation
Not one mention of sin, grace, the Sacraments, the Mass, the Rosary, the Immaculate Heart, the conversion of Russia to the Catholic Faith, the Last Judgment, Heaven, or Hell. This silence is the argumentum ex silentio that condemns them. St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (1907) condemned the Modernist proposition: “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief” (prop. 26). The conciliar sect has made this its operational principle: dogma is discarded for “action.” The “psychologist” and “chaplaincy commission” replace the confessor and the altar. The “School for the Training of Chaplains” replaces the seminary. This is the synthesis of all heresies — Modernism — which St. Pius X called “the synthesis of all errors” (Pascendi). The article is a clinical exhibit of Lamentabili proposition 59: “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement, applied or applicable to different times and places.” The antipope and his “bishop” are apostles of this religious movement, not of the immutable Catholic Faith.
The “Conversion” Narrative: Ecumenism and Religious Indifferentism
Honcharuk speaks of “God’s love” entering hearts so that “I see the dignity of the other person.” This is the language of the Declaration on Religious Freedom (Dignitatis Humanae), not of the Gospel. The Syllabus (error 16) condemns: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation.” The antipope’s “prayers” and “blessings” for a “bishop” of a schismatic nation (Ukraine is largely Orthodox) — without any call for conversion to the one true Church — is practical indifferentism. The “False Fatima Apparitions” file correctly identifies the Fatima narrative as a tool for “ecumenism” and “religious relativism,” noting “the imprecise formulation ‘conversion of Russia’ (without specifying Catholicism) opens the way to religious relativism.” The same dynamic operates here: a vague “God’s love” substitutes for “Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus”. The antipope blesses the ministers of a false religion (the “Military Chaplaincy Commission” includes Orthodox and Uniates) and calls it “pastoral care.” This is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place.
The Geopolitical Game: The Neo-Church as a Tool of the New World Order
Honcharuk admits the war is “a game” and criticizes “Trump and Putin,” “U.S. envoys,” “Zelenskyy.” Yet he sits with the antipope who plays the same game. The “visits this summer by Archbishop Gallagher and Cardinal Zuppi” are cited as proof “the Holy See is making every effort within its power.” This is the politica ecclesiastica condemned by Pius IX: the Church reduced to a diplomatic actor among nations. The Syllabus (error 39) condemns: “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits.” The neo-church accepts this premise; it begs the State for “humanitarian corridors” instead of demanding the State submit to Christ. The “arsenal” of the antipope is not the arma spiritualia (2 Cor. 10:4) — the Rosary, the Mass, fasting, the consecration of the world to the Sacred Heart (as Pius XI did in Quas Primas and Annum Sacrum) — but the “diplomatic arsenal” of the Masonic world order. The “False Fatima” file exposes the “Masonic Operation Fatima” with its “ritualistic 200-year cycles” and “disinformation strategy.” The current spectacle is Stage 4: the neo-church fully integrated into the globalist agenda, providing religious cover for the novus ordo seclorum.
The “Light-Life” of the Neo-Church: Psychologism Replaces Asceticism
The presence of “Tatiana Goncharuk, a psychologist” and the “School for the Training of Chaplains” reveals the anthropocentric anthropology of the conciliar sect. The “False Fatima” file notes the “mortifications of the children (fasting, self-harm) bear the marks of Jansenist rigorism, not Catholic asceticism.” The neo-church has swung to the opposite extreme: Pelagian psychologism. Grace is replaced by “trauma counseling”; the Cross by “resilience”; the imitatio Christi by “mental health support.” This is the fruit of the Modernist error condemned in Lamentabili (prop. 65): “Contemporary Catholicism cannot be reconciled with true knowledge without transforming it into a certain dogmaless Christianity, that is, into a broad and liberal Protestantism.” The “chaplaincy” described is Protestantized social work, not Catholic priesthood.
Conclusion: The Neo-Church is the Whore of Babylon
This meeting is a perfect icon of the Church of the New Advent: a false “pope” (Robert Prevost), a false “bishop” (Pavlo Honcharuk), a false “peace” (worldly diplomacy), a false “charity” (naturalistic humanitarianism), a false “spirituality” (psychologized sentimentalism). They have “a form of godliness but denying the power thereof” (2 Tim. 3:5). The true Church, the Ecclesia Militans, remains where it has always been: in the catacombs of Tradition, under valid bishops and priests who keep the Faith of the Fathers, the Mass of Trent, and the Social Kingship of Christ. “He who is not with Me is against Me; and he who gathereth not with Me scattereth” (Matt. 12:30). The antipope and his hierarchy scatter; they are the synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2:9) who say they are Jews (Catholics) and are not. No Catholic may recognize, obey, or collaborate with this counterfeit church. “Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues” (Apoc. 18:4).
Source:
Bishop of Kharkiv meets the Pope: Everything must be done to end the war (vaticannews.va)
Date: 12.09.2026