The National Catholic Register portal reports on the cacophony of voices within the conciliar sect regarding the so-called “AI apocalypse,” centering the narrative on the latest encyclical of the usurper antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), entitled Magnifica Humanitas. The article parades a cast of conciliar “theologians,” “bishops,” and “lay experts” debating the merits of government regulation versus technological acceleration, all while invoking the false pope’s call for “disarming” technology and “political involvement” to slow development. This spectacle reveals the total bankruptcy of the post-conciliar establishment: having abandoned the Kingship of Christ, they now prostrate themselves before the altar of technocracy, begging the State to manage the very monsters their apostasy has unleashed.
The Antichrist’s Encyclical: Magnifica Humanitas and the Idolatry of Man
The very title of the antipope’s encyclical — Magnifica Humanitas, “Magnificent Humanity” — proclaims the anthropocentric heresy at the heart of the conciliar revolution. Where Pius XI, in Quas Primas, declared that “the hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior,” the usurper Leo XIV offers a “mentality of armed competition” replaced by a “global institution” — the conciliar sect itself — as the arbiter of technological ethics. This is the cult of man condemned by the Syllabus of Errors (Prop. 55, 77, 80), which anathematizes the separation of Church and State and the reconciliation of the Roman Pontiff with “progress, liberalism and modern civilization.” The article notes that the antipope explicitly called for “a more active political involvement that is capable of slowing things down.” Here is the ecclesia peregrina of Vatican II, stripped of all supernatural mission, reduced to a lobby group for “regulatory tools” and “international dialogue.” It is the fulfillment of the Modernist proposition condemned in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 59): “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement, applied or applicable to different times and places.” The antipope’s “movement” now applies itself to algorithms.
The Conciliar “Episcopate” as Agents of the New World Order
The article cites “Archbishop” Salvatore Cordileone participating in a “pro-human” conference in Washington, D.C., alongside “celebrities and political figures from across the spectrum.” This is the collegiality of the neo-church in action: the successors of the apostles (so-called) rubbing shoulders with the architects of the globalist agenda, legitimizing the Masonic project of a one-world government under the guise of “AI safety.” Cordileone’s statement — “The ideal would be that everyone is on the same page and everyone is confining it” — betrays a totalitarian impulse worthy of the City of Man, not the City of God. The USCCB’s creation of an “AI task force” citing “real and present danger” mimics the language of secular bureaucracy. As Pius XI taught, “The state must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders and Congregations… who are indeed the most valiant helpers of the Pastors of the Church.” But the conciliar “bishops” have no interest in the freedom of the Church; they seek a seat at the table of the Beast. Their “spokesperson” Chieko Noguchi speaks not for Christ the King, but for the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican.
The Theologian of the Technocracy: Charles Camosy and the “Pause and Pivot”
Charles Camosy, presented as a “Catholic theologian,” functions as the chief apologist for the antipope’s technocratic vision. He advocates a “pause and pivot to a totally different way of thinking about the technology” and dreams of the false pope leading “international dialogue” between superpowers. Camosy’s rhetoric — “hinge moment of history,” “global institution with strong, influential local ties” — is pure Modernist immanentism. He ignores the Syllabus (Prop. 39, 55) which condemns the idea that “The State… is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits” and that “The Church ought to be separated from the State.” Camosy wants the conciliar sect to be the State’s conscience, a role the true Church fulfills only by proclaiming the Social Kingship of Christ, not by negotiating “guardrails” for Skynet. His admission that “what is truly needed is dialogue and collaboration between the two superpowers” rather than “waging another catastrophic cold war” reveals a pacifist naturalism that denies the rights of Christ the King over nations. As Leo XIII wrote in Annum Sacrum (cited in Quas Primas): “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” Camosy offers Caesar a partnership; the true Church demands Caesar’s submission.
The Controlled Opposition: Pseudo-Traditionalists and the “COVID Parallel”
The article grants space to Eric Sammons of Crisis Magazine and Luke Burgis of “The Catholic University of America” to voice “skepticism.” Sammons correctly identifies the “coordinated media attempt to induce panic” and the demand for “more government control,” likening it to the COVID narrative. Burgis rejects the “pro-human vs. anti-human binary” and fears “extreme regulatory action.” Yet both operate entirely within the conciliar paradigm. Sammons writes for an outlet that recognizes the usurpers as legitimate popes; Burgis teaches at a university founded on the Land O’Lakes declaration of independence from the Church. Their “pushback” is not a defense of the Faith — neither mentions the Kingship of Christ, the necessity of the Catholic State, or the condemnation of religious liberty — but a libertarian squabble over *which* Caesar manages the algorithm. This is the FSSPX/Indult strategy: “give us the old Mass, that is enough for us,” while accepting the false hierarchy that destroys the Faith. They are the “schism within a schism,” distracting the faithful from the only solution: the rejection of the antipope and the return to the integral Tradition.
The Geopolitical Trap: JD Vance, China, and the Denial of Christ’s Rights
Vice President JD Vance is cited reiterating the “Trump administration’s position that the United States must have an advantage over China.” Devan Patel of the Rainey Center warns: “In the process of beating China, we must ensure that we do not become China.” This is the false dilemma of liberalism: either atheist technocracy (China) or “democratic” technocracy (USA). Both deny the Social Kingship of Christ. Pius XI condemned this in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The article’s framing — “Catholics have also expressed concerns from a foreign-policy perspective” — proves that for the conciliar sect, geopolitics replaces theology. The “U.S. ambassador to the Holy See,” Brian Burch, is “happy to have the Vatican’s input on AI regulation.” An ambassador to a false church, serving a secular state, collaborating on the management of the Antichrist’s tools. This is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place.
The Silence of the Supernatural: The Gravest Accusation
Nowhere in this lengthy dispatch does the Register mention sin, grace, the salvation of souls, the Final Judgment, or the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. The “dangers of AI” are framed exclusively in material terms: viruses, drones, infrastructure, bioweapons, “mass-casualty events.” The “remedies” are political: regulation, oversight, pauses, international treaties. This silence is the theological signature of the Antichurch. It confirms the analysis of the False Fatima Apparitions document: “The message focuses on external threats (communism), omitting the main danger: modernist apostasy within the Church.” Today, “communism” is replaced by “AI,” but the diversion is identical. The true crisis is not artificial intelligence; it is the loss of the True Faith in Rome. The true “apocalypse” is not technological but spiritual: the Great Apostasy foretold in 2 Thessalonians 2, where the “man of sin” sits in the Temple of God. The conciliar sect’s obsession with AI is a diabolical distraction, a psychological operation to fix the gaze of “Catholics” on the creature rather than the Creator.
Canon 188.4 and the Vacant See: The Only Canonical Reality
While the Register debates the “Pope’s” encyclical, the sedevacantist position — grounded in the unchanging Magisterium — remains the only coherent explanation. As demonstrated in the Defense of Sedevacantism file, a manifest heretic loses the papacy ipso facto (St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice; Canon 188.4, 1917 Code; Pope Paul IV, Cum ex Apostolatus Officio). The line of usurpers from John XXIII to Leo XIV has publicly defected from the Catholic Faith by teaching religious liberty, false ecumenism, and the evolution of dogma — heresies condemned by the Syllabus, Pascendi, and Quas Primas. Therefore, there is no Pope. The “Magnifica Humanitas” is a private opinion of a layman (Robert Prevost) masquerading as a papal document. The “Archbishop” Cordileone has no jurisdiction. The USCCB is a private corporation. The “Catholic University of America” is a secularized shell. All their pronouncements on AI are null, void, and of no effect (Cum ex Apostolatus Officio). The faithful Catholic ignores them entirely, adhering to the immutable Tradition and the true bishops (if any remain) who hold the Cathedra Petri vacant.
Conclusion: Return to the King, Reject the Machine
The article is a documentary proof of the spiritual bankruptcy of the conciliar sect. Faced with the fruits of the godless modernity they embraced at Vatican II, they beg the State for chains. They offer the world a “Christianity” without the Cross, a Church without the King, a salvation without the Savior. The integral Catholic response is not “regulation” or “dialogue” but the restoration of all things in Christ (Instaurare omnia in Christo). It is the proclamation of the Social Kingship of Christ the King over every algorithm, every state, every laboratory, and every soul. It is the rejection of the antipope and his false church as the synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2:9). It is the cry of the true Church: Non praevalebunt. The gates of hell — whether guarded by silicon or guarded by Modernists — shall not prevail against the Church built on Peter, which today endures only in those who keep the Faith entire, outside the conciliar structures, under the banner of the true King.
Source:
Amid Warnings of an ‘AI Apocalypse,’ Catholics Take Different Sides (ncregister.com)
Date: 18.09.2026