The EWTN News portal reports that the Diocese of Tlaxcala in Mexico has inaugurated a “Jubilee of Holiness and Mission” commemorating the 500th anniversary of the deaths of Cristóbal, Antonio, and Juan, the so-called “Child Martyrs of Tlaxcala,” canonized by the antipope Francis in 2017. The “bishop” Julio César Salcedo Aquino presided over a Novus Ordo service granting a “plenary indulgence” from the “Apostolic Penitentiary” conditioned on prayer for the “pope’s intentions.” This theatrical spectacle instrumentalizes the blood of indigenous children to bolster the crumbling credibility of the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican, substituting the Social Kingship of Christ with a naturalistic “missionary zeal” that serves the religion of man.
The Invalidity of Conciliar “Canonizations” and the Usurpation of Peter’s Chair
The article explicitly states that these children were “canonized by Pope Francis on Oct. 15, 2017.” From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, this act is null, void, and of no effect (nulla, irrita, et invalida). Since the death of Pius XII in 1958, the See of Peter has been vacant (Sede Vacante). The line of usurpers—John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, and now the current antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost)—are manifest heretics who, by embracing the conciliar errors of religious liberty, ecumenism, and collegiality, have automatically severed themselves from the Mystical Body of Christ. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches in De Romano Pontifice, a manifest heretic “by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” The “canonization” by a non-pope is a juridical impossibility; it is a simulacrum of the Church’s infallible magisterium, designed to manufacture saints for the neo-church’s ecumenical agenda.
The 1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 188.4, confirms that an office becomes vacant ipso facto by “public defection from the Catholic faith.” The conciliar “popes” have publicly defected by promulgating the heresies of Dignitatis Humanae and Unitatis Redintegratio, condemned *in radice* by the Syllabus of Errors (Pius IX) and Pascendi Dominici Gregis (St. Pius X). Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio declares that if a Roman Pontiff “has defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy… his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect.” Therefore, the “canonization” of 2017 is a legal fiction, a propaganda tool of the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place.
The “Bishop” Salcedo Aquino: A Minister of the Abomination of Desolation
The article centers the homily of “Bishop Julio César Salcedo Aquino of Tlaxcala.” This individual, ordained and consecrated within the post-conciliar rites (post-1968), lacks valid orders and jurisdiction. The new ordinal of Paul VI (1968) and the new consecration rite (1969) are deficient in form and intention, excising the essential sacrificial character of the priesthood and the governing power of the episcopate. As the Defense of Sedevacantism file demonstrates, a heretic cannot be a bishop: “A non-Christian in no way can be Pope… he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian.” By adhering to the antipope and the Second Vatican Council, Salcedo Aquino is a manifest heretic, outside the Church, incapable of exercising any spiritual authority. His “Mass” is not the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary but a Protestantized “table of assembly”; his “blessing” is empty; his “jubilee” is a Masonic counterfeit.
Naturalistic “Missionary Zeal” vs. The Social Kingship of Christ the King
The “bishop” declares that the celebration seeks to “renew ‘missionary zeal'” and that the children “did not wait until they were adults… to become evangelizers.” This rhetoric reveals the naturalistic core of the conciliar religion. It reduces the supernatural mission of the Church—Instaurare omnia in Christo (to restore all things in Christ)—to a horizontal, humanitarian activism. Pius XI, in Quas Primas (1925), thundered against this very error: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The conciliar sect, by denying the Social Kingship of Christ over nations and temporal society, has embraced the condemned error of laicism (Syllabus, Error 55: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church”).
The article quotes Salcedo: “Children, adolescents, and young people exposed to so many secularist ideologies need models of piety and of apostolic and missionary generosity rooted in Gospel values.” Note the bureaucratic language: “secularist ideologies,” “models of piety,” “Gospel values.” This is the language of the Civitas Hominis, not the Civitas Dei. There is no mention of the Regnum Christi, the necessity of the Catholic State, the duty of public worship of the True God, or the condemnation of false religions. The “evangelization” praised here is the false ecumenism condemned by Pius XI in Mortalium Animos (1928) and by the Holy Office in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 16: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation”). The child martyrs died for the Catholic Faith, not for a vague “missionary generosity” compatible with religious indifferentism.
The Worthless “Indulgence” of the Paramasonic Penitentiary
The article notes: “The Apostolic Penitentiary granted a plenary indulgence for the jubilee year… To obtain it, the faithful must fulfill the usual conditions: confession, Communion, prayer for the pope’s intentions, and detachment from all sin.” This is a diabolical mockery of the Treasury of the Church. The “Apostolic Penitentiary” is an office of the Roman Curia serving the usurper. An indulgence requires the authority of the Vicar of Christ; a manifest heretic has no authority to bind or loose in Heaven (Quodcumque ligaveris super terram erit ligatum et in coelis). To require prayer for the “pope’s intentions”—meaning the intentions of the antipope Leo XIV, the architect of the synodal church—is to demand communion with the Great Apostasy. It is an act of idolatry, binding the faithful to the synagoga Satanae. As the Syllabus condemns (Error 23): “Roman pontiffs and ecumenical councils have wandered outside the limits of their powers… and have even erred in defining matters of faith and morals.” The current “pontiff” has erred *in fide*; his “intentions” are the destruction of the Faith. No indulgence flows from this source.
Silence on the Necessity of the Catholic Church for Salvation
The gravest accusation against this article and the celebration it describes is its total silence on the supernatural economy. There is no mention of:
– The necessity of Baptism of Water for salvation (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus).
– The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass as the Propitiatory Victim for the living and the dead.
– The reality of Hell and the Particular Judgment.
– The Immaculate Conception and the Mediation of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
– The doctrinal purity required to die a martyr (odium fidei).
Instead, we read: “God’s protection does not mean an absence of physical hardships or persecution but rather the grace to ‘persevere in the faith.'” Which “faith”? The faith of the Council of Trent, or the “faith” of the Second Vatican Council which teaches that Muslims “adore the one God” (Lumen Gentium 16)? The conciliar sect uses the memory of true martyrs—who died refusing idolatry—to legitimize a church that now places idols (Pachamama) in the Vatican gardens and worships with false religions in Assisi. This is the “diversion from apostasy” identified in the False Fatima Apparitions analysis: “The message focuses on external threats… omitting the main danger: modernist apostasy within the Church.”
Conclusion: A Masonic Staging for the Synodal Church
This jubilee is not a Catholic act of veneration. It is a Masonic staging (psychological operation), utilizing the symbolism of innocent blood to sanctify the synodal revolution. The dates align with the conciliar calendar of novelty; the “indulgence” binds souls to the antipope; the “bishop” validates the schism. True Catholics, adhering to the immutable Tradition and the vacant See, reject this spectacle entirely. We honor the child martyrs of Tlaxcala by rejecting the false church that exploits their memory, by holding fast to the Quas Primas mandate that Christ must reign in mente, in voluntate, in corde (in mind, will, and heart) of individuals and nations, and by awaiting the true restoration of the Papacy and the Hierarchy. Non possumus—we cannot communicate with this abomination.
Source:
Mexico commemorates 500th anniversary of Child Martyrs (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 29.09.2026