Vatican News portal reports (27 October 2026) that the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) will conduct a 12-day “Apostolic Journey” to Uruguay, Argentina, and Peru (6–17 November), featuring staged meetings with survivors of clerical sexual abuse. The press office frames these encounters as expressions of “closeness,” “healing,” and building a “safe and spiritually healthy place,” citing similar performances in Spain and France. This spectacle of therapeutic dialogue substitutes the potestas iurisdictionis (power of jurisdiction) and potestas ordinis (power of orders) with the language of NGO trauma-management, confirming the conciliar sect’s total abandonment of the Church’s divine constitution.
Theatrical Mercy as Substitute for Divine Justice
The cited article reveals the neo-church’s operative theology: abuse is “first and foremost a human problem” (Leo XIV’s words on the return flight from Metz), and the Church’s role is to “help them find healing.” This is pure Pelagian naturalism. Pope Pius XI, in Quas Primas, teaches that “the Kingdom of Christ encompasses all men… most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ” and that “when God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed”. The antipope’s reduction of the scelus (crime) of clerical abuse to a “human problem” requiring “healing paths” accessible to “anyone who needs them” is a formal denial of the Kingship of Christ over the moral order. The true Church, as Quas Primas declares, possesses a threefold authority: legislative, judicial, and executive – “all must obey His commands, and this under the threat of announced punishments, which the obstinate cannot escape.” Where are the ferendae sententiae excommunications? Where are the canonical trials? Where is the poenitentia imposed by the potestas clavium (power of the keys)? The conciliar sect replaces the judicium of God with the “dialogue” of men.
The Conciliar Sect’s Redefinition of Scandal
The article notes Leo XIV calls abuse a “scourge,” “scandal,” and “real wound.” Yet the Syllabus of Pius IX (Error 63) condemns the proposition: “It is lawful to refuse obedience to legitimate princes, and even to rebel against them.” The true scandal (scandalum) is not merely the sin of the predator, but the systematic refusal of the conciliar hierarchy to exercise the potestas coercitiva (coercive power) entrusted by Christ. St. Robert Bellarmine, cited in the Defense of Sedevacantism, teaches: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member.” The “bishops” and “priests” of the neo-church, formed in the seminaries of Vatican II, devoid of the character indelebilis of the true priesthood (the new ordinal of 1968 being deficient in form and intention), simulate the Sacrifice while living in sodomy. The “meetings with survivors” are propaganda exercises to legitimize a paramasonic structure that has ipso facto lost all jurisdiction by public defection from the Faith (Canon 188.4, 1917 Code). As Pope Celestine I declared of Nestorius: “he could not remove anyone by sentence who himself had already shown that he must be removed.”
Absence of Supernatural Remedy: Confession, Penance, Excommunication
Read the Vatican News text carefully: not a single mention of the Sacrament of Penance, of satisfaction, of the state of grace, of the reality of Hell, or of the poena aeterna. The “healing” offered is purely psychological, sociological, horizontal. Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 26) condemns: “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief.” Here the practical function is reduced to “culture of prevention and protection” – a Masonic slogan. The Council of Trent (Sess. XIV, c. 3) defines the forma of Penance: “I absolve thee.” The conciliar sect offers “listening” and “accompaniment.” This is the heresy of Modernism condemned by St. Pius X: “Revelation was merely man’s self-awareness of his relationship to God” (Prop. 20); “Faith… is ultimately based on a sum of probabilities” (Prop. 25). The “survivors” are not directed to the Tribunal of Mercy (Confession) but to the “Apostolic Nunciature” for a photo-op with the antipope. This is idolatry of the victim replacing the cultus latriae due to God alone.
The “Safe Church” Heresy: Naturalistic Sociology Replaces Holiness
The press release speaks of ensuring “the Church is a safe and spiritually healthy place.” This is the language of UNESCO, not the Bride of Christ. Pius XI in Quas Primas states: “His kingdom… is opposed only to the kingdom of Satan and the powers of darkness – and requires its followers not only to renounce earthly riches and possessions… but also to deny themselves and carry their cross.” The conciliar sect’s “safe church” is a counter-church of the Antichrist, where “safety” means protection from the lex divina and the sanctitas that condemns sin. The Syllabus (Error 55) condemns: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.” The neo-church implements this by adopting the State’s safeguarding bureaucracies (Proyecto Repara, “Ending Clergy Abuse” boards) as its own magisterium. The “culture of prevention” replaces the cultura vitae rooted in the Sacrosanctum Mysterium. As the False Fatima Apparitions document exposes: “The efficacy of Holy Mass is diminished in favor of spectacular acts.” These meetings are the spectacular acts of the new religion of man.
Complicity in the Destruction of the Priesthood
The article mentions “abuse committed by clergy and other members of the Church.” It fails to identify the root cause: the invalidity of the new rite of ordination (1968) and the heretical formation of the conciliar “presbyterate.” Lamentabili (Prop. 50) condemns: “The elders… were appointed by the Apostles as priests or bishops to ensure order… but they did not, in the proper sense, continue the apostolical mission and authority.” The “clergy” of the neo-church are functionaries of a Masonic “psychological operation” (per the False Fatima analysis), trained in the “theology” of Rahner, Kung, and Wojtyla. The “meetings” in Madrid (Proyecto Repara) and Lourdes are staged events to whitewash the sect’s institutional complicity. The antipope’s reference to abuse having “another whole dimension added to it, because people’s lives of faith are deeply wounded” implicitly acknowledges the sacrilegium of simulating the Sacraments while living in mortal sin – yet he offers no correction, only “accompaniment.” This is the mysterium iniquitatis operating openly.
The Masonic Blueprint: Dialogue Over Doctrine
The False Fatima Apparitions document details the “Disinformation strategy: Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” The current “Apostolic Journey” is Stage 4: Global normalization of the counter-church via humanitarian PR. The Syllabus (Error 80) condemns: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.” Leo XIV’s itinerary – Uruguay, Argentina, Peru – targets nations where the conciliar sect’s “liberation theology” and “synodality” have already devastated the Faith. The “meetings with survivors” are liturgies of the new religion, where the “victim” replaces the Victima (Christ on the Cross), and “healing” replaces Redemptio. Non est aliud nomen sub caelo datum hominibus, in quo oporteat nos salvari (Acts 4:12) – “There is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved.” The conciliar sect offers the name of “safeguarding”; the true Church offers the Name of Jesus Christ the King.
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation in Action
This “Apostolic Journey” is a diabolical parody of the Visitatio Pastoralis. The true Bishop, as St. Pius X teaches in Pascendi, guards the depositum fidei and feeds the flock with doctrina sana. The antipope feeds them “dialogue” and “prevention protocols.” The faithful Catholic, adhering to the lex credendi of Trent and the lex orandi of the Missale Romanum of St. Pius V, recognizes these structures as the “abomination of desolation standing in the holy place” (Matt 24:15). No “meeting with survivors” can legitimize a hierarchy that has ipso facto vacated its sees by heresy (Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice; Canon 188.4; Cum ex Apostolatus Officio). Return to the Mass of Ages. Return to the Catacombs. Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV to meet abuse survivors in Latin America (vaticannews.va)
Date: 27.10.2026