The Vatican News portal reports on the General Audience of the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) on 4 November 2026. The antipope solicits prayers for an imminent “Apostolic Journey” to Uruguay, Argentina, and Peru, announces two beatification ceremonies — one in Guatemala for a priest killed in 1983, another in Spain for 80 “martyrs” of the Spanish Civil War — and invokes the liturgical memorial of St. Charles Borromeo. This spectacle manifests the total apostasy of the conciliar sect: a false pope undertaking diplomatic junkets to Masonic republics, manufacturing “blesseds” to sanctify revolution, and prostituting the name of a true Counter-Reformation saint to legitimize the abomination of desolation occupying the Vatican.
The Usurper’s “Journey”: Diplomatic Treason Against the Kingship of Christ
The antipope’s request — “I ask you to accompany me with your prayers, that the Lord may bless this mission in these countries, which are so dear to me” — reveals the naturalistic reduction of the papal office to a humanitarian NGO directorship. There is no mention of the Social Kingship of Christ (Quas Primas), no call for the public recognition of Christ’s rights over Uruguay, Argentina, and Peru, no condemnation of the Masonic constitutions, the legalized abortion, the “gender” ideology, or the socialist governments ruling these nations. Pius XI taught unequivocally: “When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed” (Quas Primas, citing Ubi arcano). The antipope’s “mission” is not the missio ad gentes of the Divine Mandate (Mt 28:19-20), but a pilgrimage of capitulation to the Civitas Diaboli.
The Syllabus of Pius IX condemns the error that “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship” (Error 77) and that “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). Leo XIV’s “Apostolic Journey” is the living embodiment of these condemned errors. He travels not as Vicar of Christ demanding submission to the King of Kings, but as a “pilgrim of dialogue” seeking modus vivendi with the powers of darkness. The phrase “proclaiming the Gospel with joy” rings hollow when stripped of the necessitas baptismi, the condemnation of sin, and the call to conversion — the very kerygma of the Apostles.
Beatifying the Revolution: The Manufacture of “Martyrs” for the Neo-Church
The announcement of two beatifications exposes the sacrilegious instrumentalization of sanctity by the conciliar sect.
In Antigua, Guatemala, Servant of God Augusto Rafael Ramírez Monasterio, a priest of the Order of Friars Minor who was killed in hatred of the faith in 1983, will be beatified. Meanwhile, in Santander, Spain, Servants of God Francesco González de Córdova, a diocesan priest; and 79 companions, including priests, seminarians and laypeople, will be beatified. “During the Spanish persecution of the last century,” the Pope underlined, “they did not hesitate to shed their blood out of love for Christ.”
First, the Guatemalan case: 1983 was the height of Liberation Theology — a Marxist heresy condemned by the authentic Magisterium (cf. Libertatis Nuntius, 1984, though even that document is tainted by conciliar ambiguity). A priest killed in that context was often a victim of odium iustitiae (hatred of justice/social order) or intra-revolutionary strife, not odium fidei (hatred of the Catholic Faith). The neo-church’s expanded definition of “martyrdom” to include “social witnesses” is a theological fraud designed to canonize the revolution. As Pius XII warned in Mystici Corporis, the Church does not canonize political activists.
Second, the Spanish “80 companions”: The Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) saw genuine martyrs — thousands of priests, religious, and laity slaughtered by Masonic-Communist-Anarchist militias in odium fidei. True martyrs like the Mártires de la Tradición or the Claretians of Barbastro died forgiving their executioners, professing the Kingship of Christ. However, the conciliar beatification factories (initiated by the apostate John Paul II and accelerated by Bergoglio) have systematically obscured the anti-Christian, Masonic nature of the persecution, transforming the martyrs into vague “witnesses of fraternity” and “dialogue.” The antipope’s phrase — “They make visible yet another part of the ‘great multitude’ of the Lord’s friends” — reduces the Church Triumphant to a humanitarian “great multitude” of NGOs. It echoes the Apocalypse (7:9) but empties it of the palma martyrii and the sanguis Agni (Rev 7:14). True martyrdom bears witness to Veritas; the neo-church’s “martyrs” bear witness to relativism.
Profaning St. Charles Borromeo: The Counter-Reformer Invoked by the Revolution
“Today,” the Pope recalled, “we celebrate the liturgical memorial of Saint Charles Borromeo, the distinguished Bishop of the Diocese of Milan, who, animated by an ardent love for the Lord, was a teacher and guide to his brothers and sisters.” “Following his example,” Pope Leo said, “allow yourselves to be led by Christ in your daily lives.”
This is blasphemous irony. St. Charles Borromeo (1538-1584) was the hammer of heretics, the architect of the Council of Trent’s implementation, the founder of seminaries to ensure priestly orthodoxy, the scourge of lax clergy, and the defender of episcopal rights against civil encroachment. He excommunicated the rebellious Humiliati order and fought Protestant errors with fire and sword. To hear his name on the lips of Robert Prevost, a manifest heretic who accepts Vatican II’s religious liberty, false ecumenism, and collegiality, is a profanatio sacramenti.
St. Charles would have excommunicated Leo XIV ipso facto for the heresy of religious liberty (Dignitatis Humanae) alone. The Syllabus (Error 15, 16, 17, 18) and Quanta Cura condemn the very “freedom of conscience” the conciliar sect enshrines. St. Charles enforced Cum ex Apostolatus Officio (Pope Paul IV, 1559) — the Bull declaring that a heretic elected pope is null, void, and of no effect — a law referenced 19 times in the 1917 Code. The antipope’s invocation of the Saint is a diabolical mockery, using the Saint’s authority to legitimize the Great Apostasy (2 Thess 2:3).
The Theological Bankruptcy: Sedevacantism Vindicated by the Evidence
This “General Audience” is not an exercise of the Petrine Ministry. It is a theatrical performance by a layman (invalidly “ordained” in the novus ordo rite of Paul VI, 1968, which lacks the form and intention for the Sacrament of Order) who has publicly adhered to the synthesis of all heresies: Modernism (St. Pius X, Pascendi Dominici Gregis; Lamentabili Sane Exitu).
The Defense of Sedevacantism file provides the irrefutable canonical and theological proof:
- Bellarmine (De Romano Pontifice): “A Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head… he may be judged and punished by the Church.”
- Canon 188.4 (1917 Code): “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration… if the cleric: 4. Publicly defects from the Catholic faith.”
- Pope Paul IV, Cum ex Apostolatus Officio (1559): If a Cardinal or Roman Pontiff “has defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect.”
- Nestorian Precedent (Pope Celestine I): A heretic loses jurisdiction before any declaratory sentence; “he could not remove anyone by sentence who himself had already shown that he must be removed.”
Robert Prevost (“Leo XIV”), by accepting the Second Vatican Council, the New Mass, religious liberty, and the “hermeneutic of continuity,” is a manifest formal heretic. He ceased to be Pope (if he ever validly was one, which the invalid rites cast into extreme doubt) the moment he accepted the office under heretical presuppositions. His “Apostolic Journey” is a circuit of a private individual; his “beatifications” are null and void acts of a usurper lacking jurisdiction; his citation of St. Charles is identity theft.
Symptomatic Level: The Neo-Church as the “Abomination of Desolation”
The article’s tone — bureaucratic, therapeutic, anthropocentric — is the linguistic fingerprint of the Antichurch. Words like “accompany,” “journey,” “mission,” “friendship,” “rekindle,” “proclaiming with joy” belong to the vocabulary of Modernist immanence (condemned in Lamentabili, props. 22, 58, 59: “Truth changes with man,” “Christ did not proclaim a specific doctrine”). The supernatural categories — Sin, Grace, Judgment, Hell, Kingship of Christ, Conversion of Nations, Condemnation of Error — are entirely absent. This silence is the gravissima accusatio.
The “beatifications” in Guatemala and Spain serve the Masonic ecumenical project (cf. False Fatima Apparitions file: “The imprecise formulation ‘conversion of Russia’… opens the way to religious relativism. It can serve to legitimize dialogue with schismatic Orthodoxy”). By beatifying “martyrs” of the Spanish Civil War without explicitly condemning the Masonic-Communist ideology that killed them, the neo-church sanitizes the revolution. By beatifying a 1983 Guatemalan priest, it sanctifies the Liberation Theology milieu. This is Stage 3 of the Masonic Operation described in the Fatima file: “Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.”
Conclusion: No Communion with the Usurper
The faithful Catholic, adhering to the integral Faith of the Fathers, the Councils, and the pre-1958 Magisterium, must reject entirely this “Pope Leo XIV,” his “journeys,” his “beatifications,” and his “general audiences.” They are the pompa diaboli of the Church of the New Advent, the paramasonic structure occupying Rome. Quas Primas demands: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate.” The antipope does the opposite: he refuses public veneration to Christ the King before the nations, preferring the “dialogue” condemned by the Syllabus.
St. Charles Borromeo, ora pro nobis — that we may have the fortitude to resist unto blood (Heb 12:4) the counterfeit church and her false shepherds, and remain faithful to the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary, the Sedes Vacans, and the Social Kingship of Christ the King. Non praevalebunt (Mt 16:18).
Source:
Pope Leo XIV invites the faithful to pray for Apostolic Journey to Latin America (vaticannews.va)
Date: 04.11.2026