VaticanNews portal reports on May 23, 2026, that the usurper Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) made a pastoral visit to Acerra, Italy, in the region known as the “Land of Fires,” delivering an address that completely omitted the Kingship of Christ, the necessity of the Most Holy Sacrifice, and the supernatural destiny of man, replacing the Catholic faith with a naturalistic, environmentalist humanism. The cited article relates the speech of the conciliar antipope to mayors and residents, in which he urged them to “serve life” and take responsibility for the environment, framing the entire discourse within the parameters of the post-conciliar revolution’s social gospel while remaining entirely silent on the eternal truths of the Catholic religion.
A Sermon Without Christ: The Theological Bankruptcy of Leo XIV’s Address
The address delivered by Leo XIV in Acerra represents a quintessential example of the conciliar sect’s systematic reduction of the Catholic Faith to mere humanitarian activism. While the article presents the visit as a call to “serve life” and protect the environment, a rigorous analysis from the perspective of integral Catholic theology reveals a discourse that is not merely incomplete, but fundamentally opposed to the supernatural mission of the true Church. By omitting the absolute necessity of the sacraments, the reality of original sin, and the primacy of the salvation of souls, the antipope demonstrates that the structures occupying the Vatican have fully embraced the abomination of desolation foretold by the prophets.
The Omission of the Supernatural: A Purely Naturalistic Framework
The most glaring defect in Leo XIV’s address is the complete absence of any reference to God the Creator as the ultimate end of creation, or to Jesus Christ as the sole Redeemer of mankind. The antipope stated that the “stirring of dignity and responsibility… comes from God the Creator,” yet immediately reduced this divine impulse to a naturalistic concern for environmental preservation and social justice.
In true Catholic teaching, as defined by the Council of Trent and the unchanging Magisterium, man’s primary duty is to know, love, and serve God in this life to be happy with Him forever in the next. The antipope’s speech, however, focuses exclusively on temporal well-being, economic models, and ecological balance. This is the very essence of Modernism, condemned by Saint Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis, which reduces religion to a sentiment aimed at improving earthly conditions rather than a divinely revealed truth demanding supernatural faith. The “life” Leo XIV urges his audience to serve is stripped of its supernatural dimension; it is merely biological and civic existence, devoid of grace and the Beatific Vision.
The “Desertification of Consciences” Without the Remedy of Grace
Leo XIV warned against the “desertification of consciences,” identifying “fatalism, complaining, and shifting blame” as the root of illegality. While the observation of moral decay is accurate, the proposed remedy is entirely naturalistic. The antipope called for “ethical action and active remembrance,” “educational commitment,” and a “change in economic, civic, and even religious mentality.”
From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, this is a prescription for spiritual death. Consciences are not formed by “educational commitment” or “civic mentality,” but by the preaching of the Gospel, the administration of the sacraments, and the grace won by the Most Holy Sacrifice of Calvary. The true remedy for the desertification of consciences is the return to the immutable doctrines of the Faith and the valid administration of the sacraments of grace. By ignoring the necessity of the sacrament of Penance and the propitiatory nature of the Mass, Leo XIV offers a cure that cannot heal the disease of sin. As Pope Pius IX taught in the Syllabus of Errors, “Moral laws do not stand in need of the divine sanction” is a condemned proposition; yet the antipope’s entire discourse operates on this very assumption, seeking to build a just society on purely human foundations without reference to the divine law.
The Cult of “Laudato Si'” and the Neo-Church’s Idolatry
The article highlights Leo XIV’s reliance on the encyclical Laudato Si’ of his predecessor, the apostate Francis. The antipope quoted Francis’s call for an “ecological culture” that is a “different way of looking at things.” This reliance on the conciliar magisterium, which is itself a synthesis of all errors, demonstrates the continuity of the post-conciliar revolution.
The veneration of the environment and the concept of “Mother Earth” promoted by the conciliar sect often borders on pantheism, which was condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (Proposition 1): “There exists no Supreme, all-wise, all-provident Divine Being, distinct from the universe, and God is identical with the nature of things.” By shifting the focus of “care” from the immortal soul to the material earth, the neo-church commits a profound idolatry. The “common good” Leo XIV speaks of is entirely temporal, ignoring the supernatural common good which is the salvation of souls. The true Church has always taught that the material world is to be used for the glory of God and the salvation of souls, not worshipped as an end in itself. The “covenant” the antipope calls for is a naturalistic pact of social responsibility, entirely devoid of the New and Eternal Covenant sealed by the Blood of Christ.
The Silence on the Social Reign of Christ the King
Perhaps the most damning omission in Leo XIV’s address is the complete silence on the Social Reign of Jesus Christ. When addressing mayors and public officials, the antipope had the perfect opportunity to remind them of their duty to recognize Christ the King and to order their laws according to the principles of the Gospel. Instead, he spoke of “public and private organizations” strengthening a “covenant” based on “educational and social” fruits.
Pope Pius XI, in his encyclical Quas Primas, unequivocally stated: “The Kingdom of our Redeemer encompasses all men… and it matters not whether individuals, families, or states, for men united in societies are no less subject to the authority of Christ than individuals.” Pius XI further warned that when Christ is removed from the laws and states, “the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” Leo XIV’s speech is a practical application of this destruction. By failing to demand that the state recognize the divine law and the authority of the true Church, the antipope acts as an apostle of the secularism and laicism that Pius XI condemned as the “plague that poisons human society.” The “change in religious mentality” Leo XIV desires is not a return to Tradition, but a further descent into the religious indifferentism that places all “civic” religions on the same level.
Conclusion: The Anti-Church’s Missionary Imposture
The visit to Acerra and the address delivered by Leo XIV are not acts of the true Church, but operations of the paramasonic structure that has usurped the Vatican. The language of “serving life” and “protecting the earth” is the language of the New World Order, not of the Catholic Church. The true Church, founded by Christ, has a supernatural mission: to teach all nations, baptize them, and lead them to eternal salvation. The conciliar sect replaces this with a naturalistic mission of social engineering and environmentalism.
Until the usurpers in the Vatican are removed and the true Church is restored to her rightful authority, such addresses will continue to lead souls astray, offering them stones instead of bread, and the empty promises of earthly progress instead of the eternal treasures of Heaven. The faithful must reject this modernist imposture and cling to the immutable Tradition of the Catholic Faith, which alone can bring true peace and justice to the world.
Source:
Pope Leo in Acerra: 'Let us take responsiblity and serve life' (vaticannews.va)
Date: 23.05.2026