Antichurch

The article from the *National Catholic Register* reports that the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) filed an amicus brief before the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that birthright citizenship is not only a constitutional requirement but also a moral imperative grounded in Catholic teaching. Critics, including Catholic scholars, contend the brief inflates Church doctrine and offers weak legal reasoning. Bishop Daniel Flores of Brownsville, Texas, defended the brief as aligned with human dignity, subsidiarity, and the social character of human nature, even equating opposition to the current policy with the infamous *Dred Scott* decision. The brief, however, cites no specific magisterial document requiring birthright citizenship, a point noted by critics who observe that the Church has no explicit teaching on the subject. The legal dispute centers on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” with President Trump’s 2025 executive order challenging automatic citizenship for children of non-permanent residents. The article presents mixed reactions, with some scholars praising the brief as a powerful moral statement and others dismissing it as an incoherent overreach into prudential political matters.

**The USCCB’s brief is a modernist betrayal of integral Catholicism, reducing the Church’s supernatural mission to the promotion of a naturalistic political agenda while remaining silent on the absolute primacy of Christ’s Kingship and the salvation of souls.**