Antipopes of the Antichurch
News feed
Maine Court Rules Neo-Church Schools Must Bow to Gender Ideology for Caesar’s Gold
The EWTN News portal reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled on July 2 that the State of Maine may lawfully exclude the “St. Dominic Academy” of the “Diocese of Portland” from public tuition funding if the institution refuses to comply with state “nondiscrimination” mandates regarding “gender identity” and “sexual orientation.” The “Catholic” school, represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, sought an injunction to preserve access to public funds while refusing to facilitate “gender transitions” or mandate “opposite-sex pronouns.” The court ruled that combating “sexual-orientation and gender-identity discrimination” is a “legitimate governmental pursuit” to which funding conditions “rationally relate.” The Becket Fund hailed partial victories on hiring and religious expression but decried the “nondiscrimination” ruling as jumping “off a cliff,” citing *Carson v. Makin* (2022) and the anticipated *Mahmoud v. Taylor* (2025). This judicial decree is not an outrage but the logical, inevitable harvest of the conciliar church’s apostasy from the Social Kingship of Christ and its embrace of the condemned heresy of religious liberty.
Conciliar Sect’s Juridical Schizophrenia: Validating Schismatic Orthodoxy While Condemning Its Own Controlled Opposition
The EWTN News portal, a primary propaganda organ of the structures occupying the Vatican, publishes a canonical apologia attempting to reconcile the neo-church’s recognition of Orthodox sacraments with its recent declaration of “schism” against the Society of St. Pius X. The article, authored by Victoria Cardiel and dated July 9, 2026, cites “Father” Davide Cito, a professor at the “Pontifical University of the Holy Cross,” and sources within the “Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith” led by “Cardinal” Víctor Manuel Fernández. It argues that the “Orthodox” are not in “formal schism” due to the 1965 “lifting of excommunications” by “Paul VI” and “Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagoras,” whereas the SSPX has now committed a “formal act of breaking ecclesial communion” through unauthorized episcopal consecrations. This juridical gymnastics exposes the theological bankruptcy of the conciliar sect: it validates the sacraments of schismatics who deny the Papacy, while condemning a group that recognizes the “pope” but rejects the Council, proving that the neo-church’s unity is founded not on the Faith but on adherence to the Second Vatican Council.
Conciliar Sect’s “Ecological Conversion” Exposes Apostasy: Fiat’s Electric Fleet Replaces Christ’s Kingship
The EWTN News portal reports that the Italian automaker Fiat, a subsidiary of the globalist conglomerate Stellantis, has donated thirty electric vehicles to the Vatican City State as part of the so-called “Ecological Conversion 2030” program. The delivery ceremony, attended by the governorate’s secretary-general “Archbishop” Emilio Nappa and Fiat CEO Olivier François, marks the latest step in the conciliar sect’s alignment with the United Nations’ Agenda 2030. The initiative explicitly aims at “zero emissions,” “climate neutrality,” and “sustainable mobility,” reducing the Church’s mission to the management of a carbon footprint. This public embrace of the Masonic environmentalist agenda constitutes a formal renunciation of the regnum Christi (Kingdom of Christ) in favor of the regnum mundi (kingdom of the world).
The user wants me to process the provided article about a New York priest charged with child pornography possession from a sedevacantist/traditionalist Catholic perspective, following extremely detailed and specific instructions.
Let me analyze the requirements carefully:
1. **Perspective**: Integral Catholic faith / sedevacantist perspective (pre-1958 theology only)
2. **Tone**: Polemical, erudite, authoritative, polemical, using Latin maxims
3. **Format**: HTML for WordPress, with specific structure
3. **Category**: “Antichurch” (since it’s about post-conciliar church clergy)
4. **Naming conventions**: “pope”, “bishop”, “priest”, “diocese”, “diocese” in quotes; “antipope” for post-1958 popes; “conciliar sect”, “neo-church”, etc.
5. **Forbidden references**: No positive mentions of Fatima, Medjugorje, La Salette, Padre Pio, post-1958 “saints”, Lefebvre, FSSPX, indult groups
4. **Structure**:
– Category + Title line
– Summary (no heading) ending with sharp thesis sentence
– `
Varia
Announcement:
– News feed –implemented
– Antipopes separate web sites with their all documents refutation – in progress