Antipopes of the Antichurch
News feed
Cardinal Francis and the Modernist Gospel of Diversity as Divine Asset
Vatican News portal reports on May 18, 2026, that Cardinal Sebastian Francis, Archbishop of Penang in Malaysia, during an interview conducted within the framework of the ad limina visit of bishops from Malaysia, Singapore, and Brunei, presented a vision of the Church in Asia that is thoroughly saturated with the post-conciliar modernist spirit. He described the Church in the region as “vibrant” and “alive,” emphasizing adult baptisms as a sign of vitality. Most revealingly, he declared that the multi-religious, multicultural, and multilingual character of these nations—which any pre-conciliar Catholic theologian would identify as an obstacle to the spread of the one true Faith and a source of grave dangers to the salvation of souls—should be seen not as challenges but as “assets.” He explicitly warned against a “minority complex,” effectively rebuking any Catholic who might consider the overwhelming non-Catholic majority in Asian nations as a spiritual peril requiring urgent evangelization aimed at conversion to the Catholic Church as the sole ark of salvation. He further stated that “diversity is not a threat” and linked the concepts of “unity, diversity and equality” directly to the Most Blessed Trinity—a breathtaking theological confusion that equates the supernatural mystery of the Triune God with the naturalistic, horizontal categories of liberal sociology. The cardinal expressed his feeling of solidarity “with the Universal Church under Pope Leo,” thereby affirming his communion with the conciliar usurpers occupying the Vatican. This interview is a textbook exposition of the modernist apostasy: the replacement of the supernatural mission of the Church—the conversion of all nations to Christ the King through baptism and the Catholic Faith—with a naturalistic celebration of religious pluralism, in direct contradiction to the perennial Magisterium of the Church.
Leo XIV Hails Heretic as Pioneer of Ecumenism
VaticanNews portal reports that on May 18, 2026, the usurper occupying the Vatican, Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), met with Aram I, Catholicos of the Armenian Apostolic Church (See of Cilicia), and praised the 12th-century Armenian figure Nerses IV Shnorhali as a “pioneer of ecumenism” and “model of diplomacy,” noting his recent insertion into the Roman Martyrology as an example of “ecumenism of the saints.” This act is not merely a diplomatic courtesy but a profound act of apostasy, revealing the neo-church’s systematic dismantling of Catholic truth by venerating a schismatic and promoting the heresy of religious indifferentism under the guise of “dialogue.”
When the Blood of Martyrs Is Called “Attempted Murder”: India’s Anti-Conversion Laws and the Cowardice of a World Church
The article from EWTN News portal reports on the arrest and denial of bail for nine Catholics in Rajasthan, India, after they defended their church from a mob that stormed a Mass to shout accusations of “conversion.” Instead of prosecuting the intruders—who disrupted the Holy Sacrifice and brandished a knife—authorities charged the faithful with “conversion and attempted murder” under the 2025 Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act. The burden of proof falls on the accused. Bishop Devprasad John Ganawa expressed frustration at the denial of bail, while A.C. Michael of the United Christian Forum condemned the abuse of anti-conversion laws as tools to harass minorities. This case exposes not only the persecution of the Faith but the utter bankruptcy of “religious freedom” as understood by modern secular states—and the silence of the post-conciliar structures in the face of martyrdom.
The Conciliar Notion of Vocation: A Humanist Reduction of the Supernatural Call
The National Register portal, in a commentary by Deacon Dominic Cerrato dated May 18, 2026, presents a reflection on the concept of “vocation” within the post-conciliar framework. The article, while superficially touching upon traditional terminology, fundamentally redefines the Catholic understanding of vocation through a lens of modernist anthropology, reducing a supernatural call to a naturalistic exercise in self-fulfillment and social utility. The author’s thesis, that “every vocation is ultimately a summons into communion with Christ,” is immediately hollowed out by the article’s systematic omission of the primary end of man: the salvation of his soul and the attainment of eternal beatitude. Instead, the commentary promotes a horizontal, immanentist vision where “communion” is divorced from the necessity of sanctifying grace, the sacramental life, and the unchanging moral law. This analysis will deconstruct the article’s errors, exposing its foundation in the very Modernism condemned by St. Pius X and its function as a tool for the conciliar sect’s agenda of diluting the faith.
Varia
Announcement:
– News feed –implemented
– Antipopes separate web sites with their all documents refutation – in progress