Antipopes of the Antichurch
News feed
Courage International Defends Chastity Ministry Against Vatican Synodal “Calumny”
EWTN News reports that Courage International, a U.S.-based ministry for persons experiencing same-sex attraction, has denounced a Vatican synodal report as “false and unjust,” accusing the Holy See’s General Secretariat of the Synod of “calumny” against the 45-year-old apostolate. The synodal annex included testimony from a man in a civil “same-sex marriage” who described Courage meetings as “secretive and hidden” and its participants as “lonely, hopeless, and depressed.” Courage responded by insisting its meetings are merely “confidential and secure,” denied engaging in “reparative therapy,” and expressed sadness at receiving such criticism from within Vatican structures rather than from secular outlets. This episode exposes the deep theological confusion within the conciliar sect regarding the nature of sin, the virtue of chastity, and the mission of the Church — and Courage’s own defense, while factually accurate in parts, remains trapped within the very modernist framework that enabled this attack.
Oregon’s $90,000 Fine for Refusing to Bless Sodomy: A Case Study in Totalitarian Laicism
The EWTN News portal reports on a case that, while presented under the guise of “religious liberty” litigation, reveals the full spiritual bankruptcy of the post-conciliar accommodation to the sexual revolution. Frank Canepa, a Catholic counselor in Oregon, was fined $89,636 by the state licensing board for the “crime” of refusing to personally affirm a client’s same-sex relationship during a therapy session. According to the article, Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) filed an appeal citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s March 31, 2026 Chiles v. Salazar decision, which ruled 8-1 that Colorado’s “conversion therapy” ban constituted unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination. The article quotes ADF attorney Jonathan Scruggs: “The government can’t target counselors for their views and can’t force people to say things that go against their core convictions.” Terry Braciszewski, president-elect of the Catholic Psychotherapy Association, which filed an amicus brief in the Chiles case, stated: “Canepa is not cited for being malicious or non-therapeutic but rather for refraining from abandoning his beliefs … he was being ethical and moral in adhering to his therapeutic approach and care for the person.” The article frames this as a First Amendment free speech issue and celebrates the Supreme Court’s intervention as restoring “First Amendment sanity.” This entire framing, however, exposes the catastrophic failure of the post-conciliar Church to proclaim the full truth about the intrinsic disorder of sodomy and the mortal sin it constitutes, reducing the faith to a matter of private “convictions” and constitutional litigation rather than divine law.
The Diplomatic Ellipsis of the Usurper: How Leo XIV’s Preaching Serves the Conciliar Sect’s Agenda of Religious Indifferentism
Father Raymond J. de Souza, writing for the National Catholic Register, attempts to frame the ambiguous pronouncements of the current usurper of Peter’s throne, Leo XIV, as a model of “papal” statesmanship. The commentary, published on May 8, 2026, seeks to defuse the unprecedented rhetorical attacks from the Trump administration by arguing that Leo’s words, particularly his Palm Sunday sermon and his Rosary for peace, were not directed at the U.S. or Israel, but were general denunciations of war and the “delusion of omnipotence.” De Souza uses the example of John Paul II’s 1979 visit to Poland to illustrate how popes speak “elliptically,” allowing listeners to apply the message to their own conscience. The article concludes by quoting Leo’s direct statement: “I have no fear of the Trump administration,” framing this as a sign of prophetic courage. This analysis will expose the theological bankruptcy of such an approach, demonstrating how the conciliar sect’s “diplomacy” is, in reality, a cowardly refusal to preach the integral Catholic Faith, a betrayal of the Church’s divine mandate, and a symptom of the modernist apostasy that has reduced the papacy to a mere diplomatic corps for the United Nations. The very structure of the argument, which prioritizes avoiding offense to secular powers over the clear proclamation of Catholic truth, is a hallmark of the post-conciliar abomination.
The Sinking Ship of Spain: Bishops Abandon Dogma for Dialogue and Managerial Despair
National Catholic Register portal reports that the Spanish Bishops’ Conference, in a document titled “Set Out on the Journey” published ahead of “Pope” Leo XIV’s visit, has outlined seven pastoral priorities for 2026-2030. The document, born from a “conversation in the Spirit” — the same synodal method condemned as a neo-pagan exercise — admits that only 8 million of Spain’s 45 million inhabitants attend “Mass” regularly, and that the era of cultural Catholicism is over. Instead of calling for repentance, the sacramental life, and the Social Reign of Christ the King as demanded by *Quas Primas*, the bishops propose a program indistinguishable from secular NGO management, interreligious dialogue based on the condemned principle of religious liberty, and the integration of Catholic immigrants as a mere “opportunity” to rejuvenate dying communities. The document is a confession of total apostasy: it substitutes the supernatural mission of the Church — the salvation of souls through the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the sacraments — with a naturalistic, horizontal program that implicitly accepts the shipwreck of the Faith in Spain as irreversible and merely seeks to manage the debris.
Varia
Announcement:
– News feed –implemented
– Antipopes separate web sites with their all documents refutation – in progress