The Vatican News portal reports that the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) will undertake an “Apostolic Journey” to Uruguay from 6 to 8 November 2025, centering on the Solemnity of “Our Lady of the Thirty-Three.” The “bishop” of Maldonado-Punta del Este-Minas, Milton Tróccoli, president of the Uruguayan “Bishops’ Conference,” hails the visit as a “gift” to strengthen “evangelisation,” “hope,” and “Christian roots” in a “secularised society.” This orchestrated media event exposes the neo-church’s total capitulation to the spirit of the world: it substitutes the social reign of Christ the King for vague humanitarianism, replaces the extra ecclesiam nulla salus with interreligious dialogue, and parades a false Marian devotion to mask the apostasy of the conciliar sect.
The Usurper’s Itinerary: A Masonic Stage-Managed Spectacle
The very structure of this “journey” betrays its naturalistic essence. The antipope Leo XIV—an invalidly elected claimant who publicly adheres to the heresies of Vatican II, religious liberty, and false ecumenism—arrives not as Vicar of Christ to command the submission of nations to the Kingship of Christ (Quas Primas, 1925), but as a celebrity humanitarian to “strengthen faith and hope” in secular categories. The article notes the visit is the “first leg of his visit to Latin America,” treating the successor of Peter as a touring functionary of a multinational NGO. The date discrepancy—the article is stamped “05 August 2026” yet announces a November 2025 event—reveals the propagandistic nature of the neo-church’s media apparatus: truth is subordinate to narrative. As Pius IX condemned in the Syllabus (Error 55), “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church”; here, the conciliar sect actively courts the secular state’s approval, seeking legitimacy from the very powers that have dethroned Christ.
The Language of the Neo-Church: Dialogue, Secularism, and the Death of the Social Reign
“Bishop” Tróccoli’s vocabulary is a catechism of Modernism. He speaks of “dialogue with the contemporary world,” “respect and service,” “Gospel values as the foundation of a more humane society,” and the “dignity of every person and the common good.” Nowhere does he mention the rights of God, the duty of the State to profess the Catholic Faith, or the necessity of the Church for salvation. This is the laicism Pius XI denounced in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” Tróccoli’s “evangelisation” is reduced to promoting “confidence and hope” in a “secularised society”—a society the Syllabus (Error 39) defines as claiming “a certain right not circumscribed by any limits.” The neo-church does not convert nations; it capitulates to them. It does not proclaim Christus Vincit; it whispers dialogue. As St. Pius X condemned in Lamentabili (Prop. 59), the Modernist holds that “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples.” Tróccoli’s “new and hopeful horizon” is the horizon of the Antichrist: a world ordered without reference to the King of Kings.
The “Bishop” Tróccoli: A Hireling of the Conciliar Sect
Milton Tróccoli, presented as “President of the Uruguayan Bishops’ Conference,” is a functionary of the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican. His “ordination” post-1968, within the new rite of Paul VI, is at best doubtful, at worst invalid, depriving him of the character of Order and the power of jurisdiction. He speaks of “communion with the Church of Rome”—meaning the neo-church of the New Advent—while the true Church of Rome subsists in those bishops and priests who preserve the integral Catholic faith and the Traditional Mass, rejecting the conciliar apostasy. His claim that Uruguay is “a small Church, but one that always seeks to remain faithful and in communion with the Church of Rome” is a lie: it is in communion with the usurpers who have demolished the altar and the priesthood. He is a mercenarius (John 10:12) who flees the wolf of secularism by embracing him, offering the faithful not the Bread of Life but the stones of “popular devotion” and “encounter.”
Marian Idolatry and the Subversion of True Devotion
The centerpiece of the visit is the shrine of “Our Lady of the Thirty-Three,” patroness of Uruguay. The article gushes over “popular devotion,” “Marian devotion continues to grow,” and Mary who “encourages us to look to her Son.” This is the classic neo-church tactic: use a sentimentalized, detached Mariology to bypass the hard doctrines of the Faith—extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Social Kingship of Christ, the necessity of the Sacraments, the reality of Hell. The False Fatima document exposes how “Marian” operations serve as “a tool to divert attention from modernism” and “a potential Masonic ‘psychological operation’ against the Church.” While the Uruguayan title may lack the explicit diabolical pedigree of Fatima, its instrumentalization here is identical: a nationalistic, emotional focal point replacing the Universal Kingship of Christ. Pius XI instituted the Feast of Christ the King precisely because “the plague of our times, so-called laicism… began with the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations” (Quas Primas). Tróccoli’s “renewal of devotion to Mary as Mother and intercessor” while ignoring Christ’s royal authority over civil society is a substitution of the Queen for the King, the creature for the Creator—a practical idolatry serving the religion of man.
The Ghost of Wojtyla: Canonizing the Architect of Apostasy
The article explicitly invokes “Saint John Paul II,” who “travelled to the country on two occasions,” calling him a “Saint” and praising his “enduring affection.” This is the ultimate theological bankruptcy. Karol Wojtyla was a manifest heretic who taught religious liberty (Dignitatis Humanae), false ecumenism (Ut Unum Sint), and evolution of dogma; he kissed the Koran, prayed with pagans at Assisi, and canonized the enemies of the Faith. The “Defense of Sedevacantism” file proves: “A Pope-manifest heretic loses his office automatically… a manifest heretic cannot be Pope.” Wojtyla was never Pope, let alone a Saint. Tróccoli’s appeal to his “continuity” confirms that the neo-church’s “tradition” is the tradition of the Revolution. The “faithful” who remember Wojtyla’s visits “vividly” are victims of a forty-year psy-op, conditioned to accept the abolition of the Mass and the Faith as “renewal.”
The Chronological Absurdity and the Nature of the Neo-Church’s Propaganda
The article bears the timestamp “05 August 2026, 17:26” yet announces an event for “6 to 8 November” (presumably 2025, though the year is omitted in the body, only “November 2025” in the headline). This anachronism is not a mere error; it is a metaphor. The neo-church lives in a perpetual, fabricated present, untethered from history, dogma, or reality. It rewrites the past (Wojtyla a “Saint”), falsifies the present (Prevost a “Pope”), and engineers the future (a “horizon of hope” without the Cross). The call to “support us in bringing the Pope’s words into every home” is a plea for funds to sustain the Great Lie. The true Church, the Ecclesia Militans, does not measure success by “warm welcomes” or “public response,” but by fidelity to Traditio and the salvation of souls through the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary. This “pilgrimage” is a procession of the blind led by the blind into the pit of the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt 24:15). Non praevalebunt (Matt 16:18).
Source:
Church in Uruguay: Pope’s visit will strengthen faith and hope (vaticannews.va)
Date: 05.08.2026