The EWTN News portal reports that Catholic environmental advocates, operating within the structures of the conciliar sect, are pressing for regulatory safeguards on energy-intensive data centers driven by artificial intelligence expansion. Quoting officials from Catholic Charities USA, the Catholic Climate Covenant, and the Leonine Institute at the Catholic University of America, the article frames the issue through the lens of “integral ecology,” “human dignity,” and “the common good,” citing the antipope Leo XIV’s encyclical *Magnifica Humanitas* and the Vatican document *Antiqua et Nova* as doctrinal authorities. The piece reduces the Church’s mission to resource management and utility billing disputes, presenting technological ethics as a matter of “digital sobriety” and renewable energy commitments. **This is not Catholic social teaching but naturalistic humanitarianism masquerading as theology, a complete substitution of the supernatural Kingship of Christ for the technocratic management of a dying world.**
The Antipope’s Encyclical as “Doctrinal Matter”: Usurpation of Magisterial Authority
The article’s most grievous offense is its treatment of the manifest heretic Robert Prevost, styling himself “Pope Leo XIV,” as a legitimate source of binding doctrine. Scott Hurd declares: “It is a doctrinal matter to be considered,” referencing the antipope’s encyclical *Magnifica Humanitas* alongside *Antiqua et Nova* and USCCB guidance. This constitutes formal adherence to a false magisterium. As Pope Pius XII taught in *Mystici Corporis Christi* (1943), only the true Roman Pontiff, united to the Church in faith and communion, possesses the charism of infallibility and the authority to bind consciences in matters of faith and morals. A manifest heretic, by the very fact of his heresy, ipso facto loses all jurisdiction and cannot teach authoritatively (St. Robert Bellarmine, *De Romano Pontifice*, Lib. II, Cap. 30). The “Defense of Sedevacantism” file confirms: “A Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” To cite the writings of an antipope as “doctrinal matter” is to participate in the great apostasy foretold by St. Paul (2 Thess 2:3-4), recognizing the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt 24:15) as the Vicar of Christ.
“Integral Ecology”: The Neo-Church’s False Gospel of Naturalism
The article’s central theological framework—”integral ecology”—is a modernist innovation of the Bergoglian revolution, entirely absent from the immutable deposit of faith. Hurd claims concern for the environment is “closely tied to concern for local communities through the Church’s understanding of integral ecology.” This phrase, coined in the apostate encyclical *Laudato Si’* (2015), represents a pantheistic conflation of Creator and creature, condemned by Pius IX in the *Syllabus of Errors* (Prop. 1: “God is identical with the nature of things… and, therefore, spirit with matter”). True Catholic theology knows no “integral ecology” but only the ordo gratiae subordinated to the ordo gloriae. The *Syllabus* condemns the proposition that “Human reason, without any reference whatsoever to God, is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood, and of good and evil” (Prop. 3). The article’s entire discourse operates on this naturalistic plane: kilowatt-hours, water bills, noise pollution, electronic waste. Not a word of grace, sin, redemption, the Mass, the sacraments, or the Last Judgment. This is the civitas terrena exalted above the civitas Dei, precisely the secularism Pius XI condemned in *Quas Primas*: “When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.”
Reduction of the Kingship of Christ to Technocratic Resource Management
Pius XI instituted the Feast of Christ the King precisely to combat the plague of laicism which “began with the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations” (*Quas Primas*). The encyclical declares: “His reign encompasses not only Catholic nations… but His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The EWTN article, by contrast, presents a “Catholic” advocacy that petitions secular legislators and corporate boards for “safeguards,” “transparency,” and “just economic participation.” This is not the social reign of Christ the King but the social work of the Antichrist. Molly Burhans speaks of aligning AI with “human flourishing and the common good” while describing creation as “a gift entrusted to us for stewardship”—a Protestantized, secularized distortion of the Dominican doctrine of dominium rooted in the hypostatic union (St. Thomas, *Summa Theologiae* I-II, q. 90, a. 2). The true common good is the glory of God and the salvation of souls (Pius XI, *Quas Primas*; Leo XIII, *Immortale Dei*). To speak of “common good” while ignoring the summum bonum is to utter a lie.
The “Catholic Climate Covenant” and Catholic Charities USA: NGOs of the Masonic Counter-Church
The cited organizations—Catholic Charities USA, Catholic Climate Covenant, the Leonine Institute—are not organs of the Catholic Church but appendages of the conciliar sect, funded by government grants and globalist foundations to advance the United Nations’ Agenda 2030 under Catholic veneer. Kayla Jacobs complains that “companies putting in these data centers aren’t required to pay for that” higher utility costs, framing the issue as consumer advocacy. This is liberation theology applied to electricity bills. The *Syllabus of Errors* condemns the proposition that “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Prop. 41) and that “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits” (Prop. 39). The article’s entire paradigm assumes the legitimacy of the secular state as arbiter of “justice,” “equity,” and “resource allocation,” with the “Church” reduced to a lobbyist whispering in Caesar’s ear. This is the precise inversion of *Quas Primas*: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ, but let them fulfill this duty themselves and with their people, if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate.”
“Digital Sobriety”: A Pseudo-Virtue for a Pseudo-Church
Hurd promotes the antipope’s call for “digital sobriety,” urging Catholics to “use artificial intelligence intentionally rather than frivolously, recognizing that every AI interaction relies on physical infrastructure with real environmental costs.” This is Pelagian moralism devoid of grace. True Catholic asceticism—fasting, mortification, custody of the senses—is ordered to puritas cordis and the acquisition of the Holy Ghost (St. Seraphim of Sarov; *Catechism of the Council of Trent*, Part III, Chap. 2). “Digital sobriety” is a bourgeois substitute for penance, a opus operatum of the neo-church that requires no conversion, no confession, no Mass, no faith. It is the pharisaism of the modernist: straining at the gnat of a ChatGPT query while swallowing the camel of communion with heretics, participation in the Novus Ordo bread service, and acceptance of the “vaccines” derived from aborted fetal cells. The *Lamentabili Sane Exitu* condemns the modernist error that “Faith, as assent of the mind, is ultimately based on a sum of probabilities” (Prop. 25) and that “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief” (Prop. 26). “Digital sobriety” is precisely this: dogma replaced by praxis, faith replaced by carbon footprint calculation.
Silence on the Supernatural: The Gravest Accusation
The article’s most damning feature is what it omits. Not one mention of: the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass; the Real Presence; the Virgin Mary; St. Joseph; the saints; the angels; the Four Last Things; the necessity of baptism; the state of grace; mortal sin; hell; the conversion of sinners; the conversion of Russia (by the true consecration to the Immaculate Heart, not the Masonic Fatima parody); the Social Kingship of Christ; the rights of God; the condemnation of Freemasonry; the duty of Catholics to reject the conciliar sect. This silence is not accidental—it is essential. The conciliar sect cannot speak of these things because it has apostatized from them. As the “False Fatima Apparitions” file demonstrates, the Fatima operation was a Masonic psychological operation to divert attention from the modernist apostasy within the Church. Today’s “climate advocacy” serves the same function: a fumus diaboli obscuring the abominatio desolationis in the Vatican.
EWTN: The Propaganda Arm of the Neo-Church
The source itself—EWTN News—is a flagship of the “conservative” wing of the conciliar sect, designed to pacify those attached to tradition while binding them to the antipope. It publishes “news” about “Pope Leo XIV” as if he were the Vicar of Christ, legitimizing his false encyclicals, his false bishops, his false “synodality.” The byline reveals the author is a “summer news intern… studying political science at Christendom College”—a laywoman formed in the neo-church’s educational system, equipped with political categories but devoid of theological formation. This is the laicization of the apostolate condemned by Pius XI in *Quas Primas*: “Many of them do not hold the position in so-called social life, nor do they have the significance that those who carry the torch of truth should have. This unfavorable situation may perhaps be attributed to the laziness and timidity of the good.” EWTN does not carry the torch of truth; it carries the lantern of the compromise.
Conclusion: The Only Safeguard Is the True Church
The data center crisis, like every crisis of modernity, is a chastisement for the apostasy of nations from the Kingship of Christ. No “renewable energy commitment,” no “transparency initiative,” no “digital sobriety” will avert the justice of God. The only safeguard is the restitutio Christi in regnum—the restoration of the true Mass, the true priesthood, the true hierarchy, the true faith. As Pius XI commanded: “If all the faithful understood that they must fight bravely and always under the banner of Christ the King, then with apostolic zeal they will strive diligently to reconcile stray and unenlightened souls with the Lord and will stand guard so that God’s laws remain inviolate.” The EWTN article, its quoted “experts,” and the entire conciliar apparatus stand under the anathema of the *Syllabus*, *Lamentabili*, *Pascendi*, and *Quas Primas*. They are the synagoga Satanae (Apoc 2:9), and no Catholic may collaborate with their works.
Source:
Data center surge drives Catholic climate groups to press for safeguards (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 05.08.2026