The EWTN News portal reports that ten members of the conciliar sect in India were released on bail after 104 days of imprisonment under Rajasthan’s anti-conversion law, following an incident where Hindu activists disrupted a Novus Ordo service in a village chapel. The article frames this as a victory for religious freedom and a testament to the “faith” of the detained, quoting the local “bishop” and “priest” of the post-conciliar hierarchy. This narrative conceals the theological reality: the conciliar sect’s embrace of religious liberty has rendered it defenseless against the very secular and pagan powers it sought to accommodate, and its sufferings are not martyrdom for the Faith but the inevitable consequence of its apostasy from the Social Kingship of Christ.
The Conciliar Sect’s Complicity in the Destruction of Catholic Rights
The reported events in Kalinjara village reveal the utter bankruptcy of the conciliar sect’s post-Vatican II orientation. The article notes that the Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act places “the burden of proof rests on those accused of causing a conversion, who must show that it was not unlawful.” This legal inversion is the direct fruit of the conciliar sect’s surrender of the Church’s divine right to evangelize and the State’s duty to profess the true Faith. By accepting the Masonic lie of religious freedom — condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (Prop. 15, 77, 79) and Pope Leo XIII in Libertas Praestantissimum — the conciliar hierarchy stripped the Church of her ius divinum to demand legal recognition and protection as the one true religion. The “bishop” Devprasad John Ganawa, a “Divine Word missionary,” laments that “our people are victims of the anti-conversion law,” yet he and his fellow usurpers of episcopal office have spent six decades teaching the world that the State has no duty to favor the Catholic Church. They have sown the wind of Dignitatis Humanae; they now reap the whirlwind of Hindu nationalist legislation.
The Invalidity of the “Mass” and the Illusion of Persecution
The article centers the incident on the disruption of a “Mass at Communion time.” From the perspective of integral Catholic theology, this is the critical omission. The “Mass” celebrated by “Father” Arvind Amliyar — ordained in the post-1968 invalid rite of Paul VI, within a sect that has abandoned the Canon Missae and the theology of the Propitiatory Sacrifice — is at best a simulacrum, at worst an idolatrous “table of assembly.” The “Communion” distributed is not the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Christ, for the conciliar “priests” lack valid orders (Leo XIII, Apostolicae Curae; the 1968 rite lacks the form and intention for the Sacrament of Order). Therefore, the Hindu activists did not disrupt the Holy Sacrifice; they disrupted a heretical assembly. The “Catholics” who chased them out were not defending the Sanctissimum; they were defending a false worship. To call their imprisonment “persecution for the faith” is a blasphemy against the true martyrs of the Church, who died for the vera religio, not for the liberty to propagate a counterfeit Christianity.
The Linguistic Deception: “Conversion” vs. Evangelization
The article’s vocabulary betrays the Modernist framework. It speaks of “conversion” as a legal category under state law, and the “bishop” decries “false charges” of “conversion and attempt to murder.” Notice the absence of the word evangelization or salvation of souls. The conciliar sect has reduced the divine mandate “Going therefore, teach ye all nations” (Matt. 28:19) to a negotiable “activity” subject to Hindu nationalist scrutiny. The “priest” claims the intruders acted on “information about alleged cow slaughter and conversion activity.” This bureaucratic language — “conversion activity” — reveals the naturalistic reduction of the supernatural mission. The true Church does not engage in “conversion activity”; she baptizes unto eternal life. The conciliar sect’s acceptance of the State’s definition of its mission as a regulable “activity” is the essence of the laicism condemned by Pius XI in Quas Primas: “the Church’s authority to teach men, to issue laws, to govern nations… was denied.”
The Theological Absurdity of “Interreligious Dialogue” as Defense
The article mentions the “Conference of Catholic Bishops of India” and its platform “Catholic Connect.” This body, like all episcopal conferences in the conciliar sect, is a Masonic-inspired collegialist structure that usurps the monarchical governance of the Church. Its response to persecution is invariably “dialogue” and legal appeals to the Supreme Court — the very secular authority that the Syllabus condemns as having no right over the Church (Prop. 20, 42). The “bishop” thanks God for bail granted by the “Rajasthan High Court,” implicitly recognizing the legitimacy of a Hindu nationalist judiciary to adjudicate the Church’s rights. This is the hermeneutic of surrender. Pope Pius XI taught: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate” (Quas Primas). The conciliar sect, by contrast, begs for tolerance from the enemies of Christ, offering the spectacle of its “priests” and “faithful” praying in jail cells — not for the conversion of India to the Kingship of Christ, but for “release” and “bail.”
Symptomatic Level: The Conciliar Sect as a Tool of Globalist Subversion
The pattern described — “hundreds arrested under the laws but hardly any convictions,” the case of “Father” Babu Francis in Uttar Pradesh — illustrates the systemic function of the conciliar sect in the Globalist order. It serves as a controlled opposition: a religious body that claims Christian identity but operates entirely within the Masonic framework of religious liberty, human rights, and secular law. Its “martyrs” are not witnesses to Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus; they are victims of a sect that has voluntarily entered the arena of religious pluralism and now complains when the stronger pagan power crushes it. The article’s closing reference to the “St. Titus Brandsma Award” for the journalist Anto Akkara — a “saint” canonized by the antipope John Paul II, a Carmelite who died in Dachau but whose “martyrdom” is exploited by the conciliar sect to sanctify journalism and “press freedom” — seals the Modernist frame. The true Church does not seek awards from the world; she seeks the conversion of the world to Christ the King.
The Only Remedy: The Social Kingship of Christ, Not Legal Bail
The release of these ten men on bail is a temporal reprieve granted by a pagan court. It changes nothing of their spiritual state: they remain within a schismatic, heretical structure that denies the Dogma of the Faith, the necessity of the Church for salvation, and the Rights of Christ the King over India. The “joy” expressed by the “priest” and the “faithful” — “It has only strengthened us in faith” — is a subjective sentiment, not the gaudium in veritate. True strengthening in faith would be the public abjuration of the conciliar errors, the rejection of the Novus Ordo, the recognition of the vacancy of the Holy See since 1958, and the demand that the Indian State proclaim the Kingship of Christ. Until then, every “persecution” they suffer is but the chastisement of God upon a false church that has betrayed His Crown Rights. Non est pax, dicit Dominus, impiis (There is no peace, saith the Lord, for the wicked — Isa. 48:22).
Source:
Indian Catholics released after 104 days in jail under anti-conversion law (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 17.08.2026