The Vatican News portal (August 17, 2026) reports on the latest Angelus address of the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), delivered at Castel Gandolfo on August 16, in which he “urgently call[s] on the international community to work toward advancing the two-state solution, for a just and lasting peace” between Israel and Palestine. The article constructs a falsified historical continuity, claiming an “unshakeable” diplomatic position of the “Holy See” stretching back to Pius XII’s 1948 encyclical In multiplicibus curis, through Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and Francis, culminating in Leo XIV’s recent appeals. This narrative serves to legitimize the conciliar sect’s complete capitulation to the Masonic world order, replacing the social reign of Christ the King with a naturalistic, geopolitical “solution” that ignores the supernatural end of nations and the absolute necessity of the Catholic Faith for salvation.
The Naturalistic Reduction of the Holy Land to a Geopolitical Pawn
The cited article reveals the radical naturalism that constitutes the very essence of the conciliar sect’s “diplomacy.” The “two-state solution” is presented as a political imperative, a matter of “internationally recognized borders,” “sovereign homeland,” and “legitimate aspirations of both peoples.” Nowhere—nowhere—does the antipope Leo XIV, nor any of his cited predecessors in the article, mention the Kingdom of Christ, the Social Kingship of Our Lord, or the duty of nations to publicly profess the Catholic Faith.
Pius XI, in Quas Primas (1925), thundered against this very error: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed, because the main reason why some have the right to command and others have the duty to obey was removed.” The conciliar sect’s “two-state” mantra is the precise application of this condemned principle: authority derived from men (UN resolutions, international consensus), not from God. The article explicitly notes the “Holy See’s signing in 2015 of the Comprehensive Agreement officially recognising the State of Palestine”—a purely juridical act of the City of Man, devoid of any reference to the City of God. This is laicism in its purest form, the very “plague” Pius XI identified as “secularism of our times, so-called laicism, its errors and wicked endeavors.”
The Theological Impossibility of a “Palestinian Right” Apart from the Catholic Faith
The article quotes John Paul II’s 1984 Apostolic Letter Redemptionis anno: “The Palestinian people… have the natural right in justice to find once more a homeland and to be able to live in peace and tranquillity with the other peoples of the area.” This statement is theologically false and heretical. There is no “natural right” to a homeland that supersedes the supernatural right of Christ the King to reign over that land. The Syllabus of Errors (Pius IX, 1864) condemns the proposition: “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41) and “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55). By advocating a political settlement that prescinds entirely from the Catholicity of the State, the conciliar sect endorses the separation of Church and State—the very essence of Modernism.
Furthermore, the concept of a “Palestinian people” with “historical roots in that land” entitled to a sovereign state is a Modernist historical construct that ignores the theological reality of the Old Covenant’s abrogation. The Council of Florence (1442) declared: “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes, and teaches that the legal prescriptions of the Old Testament… ceased, and the sacraments of the New Testament began… Whoever, even after the passion, places hope in these legal prescriptions and submits himself to them as necessary for salvation… sins mortally.” The land promises of the Old Testament were types fulfilled in the Universal Church, not in an ethnic-political entity. To base “justice” on a “natural right” of an ethnic group to a specific territory, while ignoring the divine right of the Incarnate Word to rule all nations, is to deny the Hypostatic Union’s social consequences—that Christ, as Man, received “power and honor and a kingdom” from the Father (Quas Primas, citing Dan 7:13-14).
The Conciliar Sect’s Apostasy from the Social Kingship of Christ
The article’s chronological parade—from Pius XII to Leo XIV—demonstrates not “unshakeable” fidelity, but unshakeable apostasy. The “decisive impetus” attributed to John Paul II, the “support” of Benedict XVI, the “diplomatic initiatives” of Francis, and now the “legacy… in the hands of Pope Leo XIV” form a single, continuous rebellion against the Kingship of Christ.
Pius XI instituted the Feast of Christ the King precisely “to address the needs of the present times and provide a special remedy against the plague that poisons human society… this plague is the secularism of our times, so-called laicism.” The conciliar sect’s “two-state solution” is the plague. It seeks “peace” without the Prince of Peace, “justice” without the Just Judge, “coexistence” without the Unity of the Faith. The article admits: “The appeals of Pope Leo and his predecessors still await a response. War continues to devastate peoples, while the path towards peace appears increasingly clouded.” Of course they await a response—they are addressed to the world, not to Christ; they invoke international law, not Divine Law; they trust in the United Nations, not in the Church Militant.
The Masonic Roots of the “Internationalization” and “Two-State” Chimera
The article traces the origin to Pius XII’s 1947 call for “internationalisation of Jerusalem’s holy sites” and the 1947 UN Partition Plan. This is no coincidence. The Syllabus of Errors condemns: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). The “internationalization” of Jerusalem is a Masonic project par excellence—removing the Holy City from the temporal protection of Catholic powers (historically, the Catholic monarchies) and placing it under the “guarantee” of a Masonic-dominated international body (the League of Nations, then the UN).
The False Fatima Apparitions document in the provided context details the “Masonic Operation ‘Fatima'” with its “ritualistic 200-year cycles” (1717, 1917, 2017) and “disinformation strategy” stages. The same Masonic architecture undergirds the “two-state solution”: a permanent revolution against the Social Reign of Christ, implemented through “international law” and “human rights” rhetoric. The conciliar sect’s “diplomacy” is not the Church’s munus regendi; it is the paramasonic structure’s collaboration with the “synagogue of Satan” (Pius IX, Syllabus context) to build the Civitas Diaboli on the ruins of the Civitas Dei.
The Silence on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus: The Gravest Betrayal
The most damning aspect of the article—and of the entire conciliar “position”—is its total silence on the necessity of the Catholic Faith for salvation. Not a word on the duty of the “two peoples” to convert, to be baptized, to enter the Ark of Salvation. The “peace” proposed is a peace of the cemetery—a coexistence of the damned.
St. Robert Bellarmine, cited in the Defense of Sedevacantism document, teaches: “A non-Christian in no way can be Pope… he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian… therefore, a manifest heretic cannot be Pope.” By the same principle, a State that is not Catholic—that does not recognize Christ the King—has no true legitimacy, no true “right to exist.” The conciliar sect’s recognition of the “State of Palestine” and its implicit acceptance of the “State of Israel” (a state explicitly founded on the rejection of the Messiah) is formal cooperation in the construction of the Kingdom of Antichrist.
Pius XI warned: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate and contribute to the increase of their homeland’s happiness.” The “two-state solution” guarantees the opposite: two states refusing public veneration of Christ, two states legislating according to human will, two states condemned by the very structure of their secularity.
The False Continuity from Pius XII to the Antipope Leo XIV
The article’s attempt to rope Pius XII into this apostate lineage is a calculated falsification. Pius XII’s In multiplicibus curis (1948) and Redemptoris nostri cruciatus (1949) pleaded for the protection of holy places and the spiritual well-being of populations—not for a “Palestinian state” or a “two-state solution” as later defined by the UN and the conciliar sect. The article’s phrase “first formally outlined in 1947 in the plan adopted by the United Nations General Assembly” exposes the true god of this “diplomacy”: the United Nations, the Masonic parliament of the world.
The line of “popes” in the article—John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, Leo XIV—are, from the perspective of integral Catholic faith, manifest heretics who have lost all jurisdiction ipso facto (St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice; Canon 188.4, 1917 Code; Pope Paul IV, Cum ex Apostolatus Officio). Their “unshakeable position” is the unshakeable position of the Great Apostasy foretold by St. Paul (2 Thess 2:3). The “Holy See” of the article is the “abomination of desolation standing in the holy place” (Mt 24:15), the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican.
Conclusion: No Peace Without the King
The “two-state solution” is a satanic parody of peace. It offers the tranquility of order without the Author of Order; the justice of law without the Source of Justice; the unity of peoples without the Unity of the Faith. The conciliar sect, from its usurping throne, cries “Peace, peace,” but there is no peace (Jer 6:14), because Pax Christi in Regno Christi—the Peace of Christ is only in the Kingdom of Christ.
The only “solution” for the Holy Land, for Israel, for Palestine, for every nation, is the Social Kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ: the public confession of His Divinity, the subordination of civil laws to His Divine Law, the corporate entry of nations into His One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. Until the conciliar sect is recognized for what it is—the Church of the New Advent, the neo-church of the Antichrist—and until true bishops and priests, preserving the Tradition and the Mass of All Time, reclaim the Church’s visible hierarchy, the “appeals” of Leo XIV and his predecessors will continue to be the howling of wolves in shepherds’ clothing, leading the flock not to the green pastures of eternal life, but to the slaughterhouse of temporal compromise and eternal death.
Non est pax, dicit Dominus, impiis. (Is 48:22) — “There is no peace, saith the Lord, for the wicked.”
Source:
Two peoples, two States: The unwavering position of the Popes and the Holy See (vaticannews.va)
Date: 17.08.2026