Neo-Church Hierarchy Begs Caesar for Protection While Denying Christ the King

The EWTN News portal reports that the “patriarchs and heads of churches in Jerusalem”—officials of the conciliar sect occupying the Holy Places—issued a statement condemning attacks by Israeli settlers on the Palestinian village of Taybeh during the olive harvest. The statement, framed entirely in the language of secular humanitarianism, decries “wide-scale terror,” demands “accountability” from Israeli authorities, welcomes the intervention of European diplomats and a U.S. delegation led by the “ambassador to the Holy See,” and expresses hope that “law enforcement would continue in a serious and consistent manner.” Nowhere does the statement invoke the Kingship of Christ over nations, the duty of the Church to demand the conversion of infidels, or the supernatural end of the faithful; it reduces the Bride of Christ to an NGO pleading for “protection of civilians” and “access to agricultural land” from the very secular powers the Syllabus condemns.


The Conciliar “Patriarchs” Are Not Catholic Bishops But Functionaries Of The Neo-Church

The article speaks of “patriarchs and heads of churches in Jerusalem,” the “Latin Patriarchate parish,” and “Father Bashar Fawadleh, pastor of the Latin Patriarchate parish.” From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, these titles designate not successors of the Apostles but administrators of the ecclesia novae adventus, the conciliar sect erected by the usurper John XXIII and his successors. The Defense of Sedevacantism file establishes, citing St. Robert Bellarmine and Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code, that a manifest heretic ipso facto loses all jurisdiction and membership in the Church: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member.” The “patriarchs” signing this statement are, by their public adhesion to the heresies of Vatican II (religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality), manifest heretics who have tacitly resigned their offices. They possess no authority to teach, govern, or sanctify. Their “statement” is the press release of a paramasonic structure, not the voice of the Church.

Linguistic Level: The Vocabulary Of Masonic Naturalism Replaces The Language Of The Gospel

The rhetoric of the statement is a textbook of Modernist novlangue. We read of “wide-scale terror,” “accountability,” “impunity,” “international community,” “civilians,” “human rights,” “diplomatic delegation,” “law enforcement,” and “protection of civilians.” Not a single supernatural term appears. There is no mention of peccatum, gratia, conversio, regnum Christi, or salus animarum. The “Christian presence” is spoken of as an ethnic or cultural artifact to be “preserved,” not as the mystical body of Christ requiring the freedom to preach the Gospel ad gentes. This is the lingua novus ordo: the dialect of the Civitas Terrena masquerading as the voice of the Civitas Dei. As Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas, “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The conciliar hierarchy has not merely removed Christ from the public square; they have removed Him from their own vocabulary.

Theological Level: Apostasy From The Social Kingship Of Christ And The Rights Of The Church

The statement’s theological bankruptcy is total. It appeals to the Israeli state—a political entity founded on the rejection of the Messiah and the Talmudic denial of His Divinity—for “justice” and “protection.” It welcomes the “public rejection of the ruling by several rabbis” as a moral victory. It celebrates the intervention of “European diplomats” and the “U.S. ambassador to the Holy See” (a diplomatic envoy accredited to the Vatican usurpers). This is a direct violation of the Syllabus of Errors (Props. 19, 20, 39, 40, 41, 42, 55), which condemns the errors that “the civil power [has] the right to define what are the rights of the Church” (19), that “the ecclesiastical power ought not to exercise its authority without the permission and assent of the civil government” (20), that “the State… is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits” (39), and that “the Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (55).

Pius XI in Quas Primas declares: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… For what we wrote at the beginning of Our Pontificate about the diminishing authority of law and respect for power… ‘When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.'” The conciliar “patriarchs” do not demand that the Israeli state recognize Christ the King; they beg it to behave like a secular liberal democracy. They do not demand the conversion of the Jews (as the Good Friday prayer of the true Mass commands); they seek “dialogue” with rabbis. They do not invoke the Libertas Ecclesiae (freedom of the Church from secular domination); they invoke “international law” and “diplomatic pressure.”

The statement mentions a “religious ruling permitting Jews to take Palestinians’ olives,” calling it “unfounded, very worrying and dangerous.” Why is it unfounded? Because it violates “human rights” and “international law”? The true objection is theological: the Talmudic religion is a false religion (Syllabus, Prop. 16-18 condemned indifferentism), and a state based on it cannot but produce injustice. The conciliar leaders cannot say this because Nostra Aetate and the post-conciliar Magisterium have declared the Old Covenant “never revoked,” effectively denying the necessity of the Church for salvation for Jews. This is the ecumenism project condemned in the False Fatima Apparitions file: “The imprecise formulation ‘conversion of Russia’ (without specifying Catholicism) opens the way to religious relativism. It can serve to legitimize dialogue with schismatic Orthodoxy.” Here, dialogue with Talmudic Judaism is legitimized.

Symptomatic Level: The Neo-Church As Humanitarian NGO And Tool Of The New World Order

The involvement of the “U.S. ambassador to the Holy See,” Brian Burch, and “Riley Barnes, assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights, and labor,” alongside “European diplomats from France, Belgium, and Poland,” reveals the true nature of the conciliar sect: it is a component of the Masonic globalist apparatus. The “Christian Presence Observatory — Holy Land” sounds like a UN monitoring mission. The “patriarchs” “welcomed Israeli President Isaac Herzog’s condemnation” and “expressed hope that law enforcement would continue.” They have become chaplains to the secular order, legitimizing the very powers that persecute the Church.

The False Fatima Apparitions file identifies the strategy: “Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” The current stage is the total subordination of the visible structures to the Novus Ordo Saeculorum. The “olive harvest” becomes a photo-op for “solidarity visits” by Masonic governments. The “Latin Patriarchate” coordinates the event. The “pastor” Fr. Fawadleh receives the US delegation. This is not the Church “giving birth to and raising up ever new ranks of holy men and women” (Quas Primas); it is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place, managing “Christian presence” as a demographic statistic.

The article notes Taybeh is “one of the West Bank’s most prominent remaining Palestinian Christian communities.” The goal is “preserving the Christian presence there.” But what faith do they preserve? If they are in communion with the “patriarchs” who signed this statement, they are in communion with the conciliar sect, outside the Catholic Church. As the Defense of Sedevacantism file proves, communion with a manifest heretic separates one from the Church. The “Christian presence” thus preserved is a cultural husk devoid of supernatural life—precisely the “dogmaless Christianity, that is, a broad and liberal Protestantism” condemned in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 65).

The Silence Of The Shepherds Is The Roar Of The Apostasy

The gravest accusation is what the statement omits. It does not call the settlers to convert to the Catholic Faith. It does not call the Israeli state to recognize Christ the King. It does not warn the faithful that collaboration with the enemies of Christ endangers their souls. It does not mention the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Rosary, penance, or the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary (the true one, not the Fatima construct). It does not quote Quas Primas: “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” It does not quote the Syllabus: “The Church is not a true and perfect society… but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church” (condemned error).

This silence is the fides qua of the conciliar religion: a religion of man, by man, for man. The “patriarchs” have become the clerici saeculares of the Antichrist’s kingdom, administering the temporal goods of a dying ethnicity while the supernatural Kingdom of Christ is betrayed. The true Catholic response to the violence in Taybeh is not a press release demanding “accountability” from Caesar, but the proclamation that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church, that the Jewish people must convert to Christ, that the Muslim occupiers must convert to Christ, and that the only true peace is Pax Christi in Regno Christi. Until the conciliar sect is recognized for what it is—the great apostasy foretold by St. Paul (2 Thess 2:3)—and true bishops, priests, and faithful separate entirely from its structures, the “Christian presence” in the Holy Land will continue to be a corpse preserved by the embalming fluids of international diplomacy.

TAGS: Antichurch, Conciliar Sect, Jerusalem Patriarchs, Social Kingship of Christ, Syllabus of Errors, Quas Primas, Sedevacantism, Religious Liberty Heresy, Ecumenism, EWTN News


Source:
Jerusalem patriarchs and church leaders condemn settler attacks in Taybeh, call for accountability
  (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 22.10.2026

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Antichurch.org
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.