The EWTN News portal — propaganda organ of the conciliar sect occupying the Vatican — reports that a business apostolate styled “His Way at Work” has bestowed an entrepreneurial award upon a Spanish project, “Según tu Palabra” (“According to Your Word”), designed to facilitate Bible study for Catholics via a mobile application and annotated edition. The award was granted at the tenth annual HWAW event held in Cancún, Mexico, in October 2026. The project originated in the EROI Incubator at the Francisco de Vitoria University, a conciliar institution. The recipient, Yael Moreno, a translator specializing in Syriac, explicitly aims to “make reading the Bible trendy again” and to help Catholics “overcome their fear of reading the Bible,” which they allegedly perceive as “an encrypted book that must be deciphered.” The entire initiative is framed in the language of entrepreneurship, start-ups, and “viable business ideas,” with the protagonist discerning a “professional vocation” through a Catholic business incubator. This report manifests the complete substitution of the supernatural economy of grace for the naturalistic economy of the marketplace, reducing the depositum fidei to a consumer product and the Church’s magisterial authority to a user-friendly interface.
The Entrepreneurial Usurpation of the Apostolic Mandate
The article reveals the governing metaphysic of the conciliar sect: the reduction of the divine mission to a business model. The “EROI Incubator” is described as a “Catholic business entrepreneurship program” where the discernment question is not “Lord, what wilt Thou have me do?” (Acts 9:6) but “Lord, are you calling me to be an entrepreneur?” This inversion is the essence of the heresy of Americanism, condemned by Leo XIII in Testem Benevolentiae (1899), which warned against the confusion of natural activity with supernatural grace and the preference for active virtue over passive virtues of humility and obedience. The award ceremony in Cancún — a tourist mecca — seals the worldly character of this pseudo-apostolate. The “Growth Lab” where Moreno now develops her “business venture” confirms the commercial telos: the goal is to “launch the first prototype of the app and determine whether the concept is truly a viable business idea.” Quaestio disputata: since when is the salvation of souls a “business idea” subject to market validation? The Great Commission (Matt. 28:19-20) commands docere omnes gentes — teach all nations — not “scale a minimum viable product.”
Private Judgment Masquerading as Catholic Bible Study
Moreno laments that “it’s not all that common in the Catholic Church to know the Bible beyond hearing the Gospel at Mass and having the priest explain it during the homily.” This complaint, echoed by the conciliar sect for sixty years, is the Protestant principle of private judgment smuggled in under the guise of piety. The Council of Trent, Session IV, decreed: “Furthermore, in order to restrain petulant spirits, It decrees, that no one, relying on his own skill, shall, in matters of faith, and of morals pertaining to the edification of Christian doctrine, wresting the sacred Scripture to his own senses, presume to interpret the said sacred Scripture contrary to that sense which holy mother Church… hath held and doth hold.” Leo XIII, in Providentissimus Deus (1893), commanded that “the Holy Fathers… are of supreme authority, whenever they all interpret in one and the same manner any text of the Bible, as pertaining to the doctrine of faith or morals; for their unanimity clearly evinces that such interpretation has come down from the Apostles as a matter of Catholic faith.” The app’s promise of “personalized study tailored to the user” through “a few simple questions” is the technological instantiation of subjectivism: the user becomes the hermeneutical center, not the Magisterium. The “Bible with notes laid out to provide space for annotations” encourages the faithful to become their own exegetes, contrary to Pius XII’s warning in Divino Afflante Spiritu (1943) that private interpretation leads to “the shipwreck of faith.”
The Modernist Exegetical Framework
Moreno’s academic background — “degree in translation and interpreting… specializes in the Syriac language” — and her stated objective of “recognizing the original meaning of the words in the language in which they were conceived” reveal the historical-critical method condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (1907) and Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907). Proposition 12 of Lamentabili condemns: “An exegete who wishes to fruitfully engage in biblical studies should especially reject any preconceived opinion about the supernatural origin of Holy Scripture, which he should interpret just like other purely human documents.” Proposition 13 condemns the invention of Gospel narratives to explain “limited success of Christ’s mission.” The conciliar sect’s “biblical renewal” (Dei Verbum, Vatican II) opened the floodgates to this rationalism. The app’s promise to help users “understand the context of each book” and “apply this to concrete, everyday life” without reference to the analogia fidei, the sensus plenior, or the unanimous consent of the Fathers is Modernism packaged for the smartphone age. The reference to “AI” — “in a world where it is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish what is true from what is not, especially with AI” — is a tell: the solution to technological confusion is not the Catechism of Trent or the Roman Catechism, but another app.
Silence on the Supernatural Order: The Gravest Accusation
Nowhere in the article — nor, by implication, in the project — is there mention of: the state of grace, the necessity of the sacraments (especially Penance and the Holy Eucharist), the priesthood, the Mass, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Communion of Saints, the Four Last Things, or the Social Kingship of Christ the King. Pius XI, in Quas Primas (1925), taught: “If men were ever to recognize Christ’s royal authority over themselves, both privately and publicly, then unheard-of blessings would flow upon the whole society… For this reason, the annual celebration of this solemnity will also remind states that not only private individuals, but also rulers and governments have the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him.” The “Según tu Palabra” project knows nothing of this kingship. It knows only “entrepreneurship,” “trendiness,” “personalized study,” and “business venture.” This is laicism in its purest form: the total excision of the supernatural finality of man. The Syllabus of Pius IX (1864) condemns: “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41) and “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55). Here, the Church is separated from Christ: the “business apostolate” replaces the Ecclesia Militans.
The Conciliar University as Incubator of Novelty
The Francisco de Vitoria University (UFV) is a creature of the Legionaries of Christ, a conciliar congregation founded by the degenerate Marcial Maciel, long protected by the usurpers in the Vatican. Its “EROI Incubator” is a laboratory for the synthesis of Catholicism and capitalism, the very “cult of man” denounced by Pius XI in Quas Primas and Ubi Arcano Dei Consilio (1922). The awarding body, “His Way at Work,” operates in the same sphere as the “Jubilee of Digital Missionaries” mentioned in the article’s metadata — a Vatican II novelty that transforms the Great Jubilee of Redemption into a tech conference. The 2025 Jubilee, proclaimed by the antipope Bergoglio and continued by the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), is dedicated to “Pilgrims of Hope” and “Digital Missionaries,” confirming that the conciliar sect’s “hope” is immanent, technological, and Pelagian.
EWTN: The Propaganda Arm of the Neo-Church
The source, EWTN News, founded by the late Mother Angelica (who accepted the novus ordo missae and the conciliar hierarchy), functions as the media ministry of the abomination of desolation. Its correspondent, Nicolás de Cárdenas, boasts qualifications in “Social Doctrine of the Church and Affective-Sexual Education” — the latter a conciliar novelty unknown to Tradition. The article’s related links — “The Bible in a Year podcast,” “St. Paul Center to kick off ‘largest Bible study'” — advertise the Protestantized “Bible study” industry (Jeff Cavins, Scott Hahn, etc.) that treats Scripture as a self-help curriculum divorced from the Sacrifice of the Mass and the Divine Office. This is the Biblia pauperum of the neo-church: Scripture stripped of Tradition, Liturgy, and Magisterium, delivered via smartphone to isolated consumers.
Conclusion: The App as Idol
The “Según tu Palabra” project is not an apostolate; it is a technological idol. It promises “encounter with God and his word” through an algorithm, bypassing the ordinary means of grace instituted by Christ: the priesthood, the sacraments, the hierarchical Church. St. Pius X, in Pascendi, identified the Modernist desire to “make the religious sentiment… the foundation of faith” and to “adapt religion to the needs of modern man.” This app is the fulfillment of that program: faith reduced to “user experience,” grace to “content,” the Church to a “platform.” The award in Cancún is the thirty pieces of silver for this betrayal. Non est hic Deus tuus, Israel (Exod. 32:4). The true remedy for ignorance of Scripture is not an app but the restoration of the Traditional Latin Mass, the Catechism of Trent, the Roman Breviary, and the episcopacy uncorrupted by Vatican II. Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus; extra Traditionem nulla veritas.
Source:
Catholic Bible study project wins entrepreneurial award (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 10.11.2026