The EWTN portal reports that the French episcopate of the conciliar sect, meeting in Lourdes under the presidency of Cardinal Jean-Marc Aveline, has issued an “urgent” letter instructing Catholic healthcare institutions to amend their charters and statutes before January 2027 in order to claim a legal exemption from the newly enacted euthanasia law. The prelates cite the Belgian precedent where a similar conscience clause was abrogated in 2020, and invoke the words of the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) during his September 2026 visit: “It is impossible to consider giving death as normal. What is legal is not necessarily moral.” The assembly also approved a new “reparation” scheme for adult victims of clerical abuse, heard from the Iniave body which replaced the Inirr, and outlined a plan of “statements, gestures, and visits to significant places” during the 2027 presidential campaign while explicitly renouncing the duty to give voting instructions. Cardinal Aveline spoke of a societal “thirst for meaning” and “deep justice,” calling for the “oil of encounter” to foster dialogue “respecting differences and rejecting violence.” This maneuver reveals the conciliar sect’s definitive surrender to the secularist state: it seeks not to condemn the legalization of murder as a crime crying to heaven, but to negotiate a juridical survival space within the very legislative framework that authorizes it.
The Juridical Idolatry of the Conciliar Sect
The entire strategy of the French “bishops” rests on a sacrilegious inversion of the order of law. They do not denounce the euthanasia law as null and void ab origine because it contradicts the natural law and the divine positive law (lex divina) — Thou shalt not kill (Ex 20:13) — but instead scramble to conform their “charters, statutes, and internal rules” to the interpretive reservations of the Constitutional Council. This is the essence of legal positivism masquerading as pastoral prudence. As Pope Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed, because the main reason why some have the right to command and others have the duty to obey was removed.” The conciliar prelates, by seeking refuge in a clause granted by a Masonic-inspired Constitution, implicitly recognize the legitimacy of the civil power to define the limits of the Church’s moral witness. They have forgotten — or rejected — the Syllabus of Pius IX which condemns the error that “The civil law prevails” in case of conflict with ecclesiastical law (Error 42) and that “The Church is not a true and perfect society… but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church” (Error 19).
The Belgian Precedent: A Lesson in Futility Willfully Ignored
The bishops’ reference to Belgium — where the “conscience clause” was removed in 2020 “partly over claims it had been poorly managed” — is an inadvertent admission of the total unreliability of any legal guarantee extracted from the secularist state. Yet far from drawing the supernatural conclusion — that the only true exemption is non possumus grounded in the rights of Christ the King — they treat it as a technical warning: “This point must therefore be handled with rigor and competence.” Rigor and competence in drafting statutes replace the fortitudo of the martyrs and the parrhesia of the Apostles. The Belgian “Catholic” hospitals, having accepted the framework of the 2002 law, were inevitably swallowed by the logic of the culture of death. The French “bishops” are leading their institutions down the identical path: first, negotiate the terms of surrender; second, administer the surrender with “competence.”
Antipope Leo XIV: The Voice of the Neo-Church’s Accommodation
The article quotes the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) during his September 2026 visit to Lourdes: “It is impossible to consider giving death as normal. What is legal is not necessarily moral.” This platitude, stripped of all doctrinal density, is the rhetorical anesthetic administered to the faithful while the neo-church negotiates its coexistence with the abortion and euthanasia regime. A true Vicar of Christ would not utter a sociological observation about legality versus morality; he would thunder with the authority of Cum ex Apostolatus Officio and Quas Primas that no human legislature can legitimize the killing of the innocent, and that any “Catholic” institution cooperating — even materially — in such killing places itself outside the communion of the Church. The antipope’s words are carefully calibrated to avoid the anathematization of the law and the excommunication of its promoters. This is the hermeneutic of capitulation elevated to the highest level of the usurped hierarchy.
The Language of “Accompaniment” and “Reparation”: Therapeutic Substitutes for Justice
The assembly’s approval of a “scheme to accompany people abused as adults by diocesan clergy” to be implemented by the Iniave body (which replaced the Inirr on September 1) exposes the bureaucratization of evil. The language is entirely therapeutic-managerial: accompany, reparation body, scheme, implement. There is no mention of poenitentia, satisfactio, justitia commutativa, or the potestas iurisdictionis required to judge and punish clerical criminals. The Inirr and Iniave are not ecclesiastical tribunals but para-legal damage-control agencies designed to manage scandal and distribute financial settlements while shielding the hierarchical perpetrators from canonical prosecution. This is the novus ordo of “justice”: therapy replaces penance, compensation replaces restitution, “accompaniment” replaces conversion.
Electoral Prostitution: The Church Reduced to a “Civil Society Actor”
The bishops’ plan for the 2027 presidential campaign — “statements, gestures, and visits to significant places… without giving voting instructions” — is the quintessence of the condemned error of laicism. Pius IX’s Syllabus condemns the proposition that “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State” (Error 77) and that “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). The French “bishops” have internalized this error: they present the Church as one interest group among others, offering “contributions” to the public debate while renouncing the munus docendi to bind consciences in temporal matters pertaining to the common good. Quas Primas declares: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… For what we wrote at the beginning of Our Pontificate about the diminishing authority of law and respect for power, the same can be applied to the present times.” The conciliar episcopate, by refusing to instruct the faithful on the moral obligation to vote for candidates who defend the integral natural law (starting with the right to life), abdicates the Kingship of Christ over the temporal order and collaborates in the laicization of the State.
The “Oil of Encounter”: Religious Indifferentism as Pastoral Program
Cardinal Aveline’s closing homily — society needs “the oil of encounter” to “talk, discuss, and debate, respecting differences and rejecting violence” — is a manifesto of practical indifferentism. The “differences” to be respected include, in the current French context, the “difference” of those who champion the “right” to kill the unborn, the elderly, the disabled. To place the truth of the Gospel and the lie of the culture of death on the same plane of “dialogue” is to deny that Christ is the Truth (Jn 14:6) and that “there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). Pius XI condemns this explicitly: “The Christian religion began to be equated with other false religions and shamelessly placed in the same category.” The “oil of encounter” is the chrism of the anti-Christ, anointing the reconciliation of light with darkness. The true oil is the oleum exultationis of the Kingship of Christ, which “inclines our free will and conquers it with His inspiration, so that we are inflamed for the noblest deeds” (Quas Primas) — not for “debate respecting differences.”
The “Unprecedented and Historic” Day of Catholic Education: Formation for the World
The participation of “about 80 diocesan directors of Catholic education” in a day called “unprecedented and historic” signifies the total integration of the conciliar school system into the secularist project. These directors do not gather to discuss how to form soldiers of Christ the King who will resist the anti-Christian laws, but to calibrate their “Catholic identity” to survive within the Éducation nationale framework. The result is the production of “Catholics” who accept euthanasia as a legal reality while perhaps seeking a “conscience clause” for themselves — the very dynamic the bishops are now institutionalizing for hospitals.
Theological Bankruptcy: Silence on the Supernatural End
Nowhere in the article — nor, by necessary implication, in the bishops’ letter or the antipope’s address — is there mention of: the state of grace, the salvation of souls, the reality of hell, the Final Judgment, the Social Kingship of Christ as a dogmatic truth requiring civil recognition, the duty of public reparation for the crime of legalized murder, the necessity of the Traditional Latin Mass as the unbloody renewal of Calvary for the propitiation of divine justice. This total silence on the supernatural is the nota credibilitatis of the conciliar sect: it operates entirely within the horizontal, immanent, sociological plane. It is a para-Masonic humanitarian NGO wearing the vestments of the Church.
Conclusion: The Only True “Conscience Clause” Is Non Possumus
The French “bishops'” strategy is a diabolical trap. By urging institutions to secure a legal exemption within the euthanasia law, they legitimize the law itself and bind the institutions to the secularist framework. When the exemption is inevitably removed — as in Belgium — the institutions will have no spiritual armor left, having abandoned the principium that an unjust law is no law at all (lex injusta non est lex) and that cooperation with intrinsic evil is never permitted. The only authentic episcopal response would be: “We forbid any Catholic institution from participating in any way in the execution of this law. We declare that any ‘Catholic’ hospital performing euthanasia ceases to be Catholic. We call the faithful to resist unto martyrdom rather than comply.” But the conciliar sect has no martyrs, only managers of decline. Quas Primas remains the unanswerable indictment: “If rulers of states… wish to maintain their authority inviolate and contribute to the increase of their homeland’s happiness, let them fulfill this duty themselves and with their people.” The French “bishops” have chosen the broad way that leads to destruction (Mt 7:13), dragging “Catholic” healthcare with them.
Source:
French bishops urge Catholic hospitals to prepare to refuse euthanasia (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 10.11.2026