Antipopes of the Antichurch
News feed


Pope Leo XIV’s Meeting with Rubio Exposes the Neo-Church’s Diplomatic Charade
EWTN News Vatican Bureau reports that Pope Leo XIV will meet with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on May 7, 2026, following a period of public tension with U.S. President Donald Trump. The article describes how Trump called Leo “weak on crime and terrible for foreign policy” after the pontiff appealed for peace amid the U.S.-Israel war on Iran, and how Leo responded that he had “no fear of the Trump administration.” The piece also notes that Rubio will discuss “mutual interests in the Western Hemisphere” and that Leo will meet Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk the same morning. This article, dressed in the veneer of diplomatic reporting, reveals the utter spiritual bankruptcy of the conciliar sect’s engagement with temporal powers — a neo-church incapable of proclaiming the Social Kingship of Christ the King, reduced instead to the role of a supplicant NGO negotiating “mutual interests” with governments that openly scorn the Catholic faith.


DDF’s 2024 Condemnation of German Blessings Exposes Conciliar Contradictions and Doctrinal Bankruptcy
The Pillar portal reports that the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) published on May 4, 2026, a 2024 letter criticizing a German bishops’ conference proposal for a ritual of blessing for couples in irregular unions, stating that such a practice contradicts the document Fiducia supplicans. This publication comes after several prominent German church officials defended the handbook despite criticism from “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost). The letter, authored under the direction of Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, attempts to clarify the boundaries of the conciliar document while simultaneously upholding its fundamentally flawed premise.
This episode lays bare the internal contradictions of the post-conciliar sect: having opened the door to the blessing of homosexual unions and other objectively sinful arrangements through Fiducia supplicans, the DDF now scrambles to contain the logical consequences of its own modernist innovation, revealing that even within the structures occupying the Vatican, there exists a recognition—however confused and incomplete—that the German “bishops” have pushed the envelope too far. Yet the critique itself remains poisoned at the root, for it does not challenge the underlying heresy that the Church may bless what God condemns.


The Usurper Antipope Blesses the Social Gospel of the Conciliar Sect
EWTN News Vatican Bureau reports that the usurper antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) met with representatives of Catholic Charities USA, a flagship social-engineering apparatus of the post-conciliar sect, and encouraged them in their work despite “institutional challenges,” invoking Christ’s words “I am with you always.” Kerry Robinson, president and CEO of that organization, described the audience as encouraging and spoke of “restoring trust in the Church” through “contemporary best practices, accountability, and financial transparency.” The entire exchange is a textbook manifestation of the conciliar revolution’s reduction of the supernatural mission of the Church to naturalistic humanitarianism, stripped of any reference to the salvation of souls, the necessity of sanctifying grace, or the social reign of Christ the King.


The Neo-Church’s Secularist Fantasy: Manufacturing Hope in a Spiritual Wasteland
The National Catholic Register, a portal aligned with the conciliar sect, reports on the upcoming visit of the antipope Leo XIV to Spain, framing it through the lens of sociological optimism and the “post-secular” narrative. The article, drawing on interviews with sociologist Rafael Ruiz Andrés and “Bishop Emeritus” César Augusto Franco Martínez, presents a Spain that is “less religious” yet paradoxically experiencing a Catholic “awakening” among youth. This analysis, steeped in the language of secular sociology and conciliar optimism, reveals not a genuine spiritual renewal but the profound theological bankruptcy and strategic adaptation of the post-conciliar structure to a world it has itself helped to create. The thesis is clear: the article is a exercise in wishful thinking, using the metrics of secular social science to mask the catastrophic failure of the conciliar revolution and to legitimize the ongoing occupation of the Vatican by forces hostile to the integral Catholic faith.
Varia
Announcement:
– News feed –implemented
– Antipopes separate web sites with their all documents refutation – in progress





